this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
1421 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

76484 readers
5274 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

National Science Foundation (NSF) had offered $1.5 million to address structural vulnerabilities in Python and the Python Package Index (PyPI), but the Foundation quickly became dispirited with the terms of the grant it would have to follow.

"These terms included affirming the statement that we 'do not, and will not during the term of this financial assistance award, operate any programs that advance or promote DEI [diversity, equity, and inclusion], or discriminatory equity ideology in violation of Federal anti-discrimination laws,'" Crary noted. "This restriction would apply not only to the security work directly funded by the grant, but to any and all activity of the PSF as a whole."

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 1 day ago

I should use python more. I like when people have principles.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 31 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Jesus the current US administration are cartoonishly evil. History is not going to be kind to the United States. In 30 Years there is going to be a museum with a little plaque on the wall and it'll say "did you know the United States used to be a relevant world power?".

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 105 points 1 day ago (14 children)

NSF: "We'll give you money as long as you don't hire minorities".

Python: "Get fucked."

Chad shit

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Besides the anti-woke bullshit, it's just a bad idea to accept. It is absolutely not normal for a grant to have stipulations that if you violate some vaguely defined criteria somewhere in your organization, it can be clawed back at a later time. That's a huge liability for an organization to take on that they may suddenly owe a million dollars some time in the future.

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean basically yeah, "DEI" and "Woke" are right wing buzzwords that basically can mean whatever, and the Trump admin et al know this. They could say "letting x people use this is woke" or "hiring y people is DEI". The Anti-DEI movement is just an excuse for actual discrimination because now we have people being fired not because they are unfit for their job, but because they're from a minority who was deemed more qualified than someone who was White, Male and Cishet.

I mean Hegseth fired the Chief of Naval Operations because she was a woman. Straight up.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 22 hours ago

What a time we live in. It really feels like a fever dream

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 68 points 1 day ago

Congratulations for having a real spine and showing the world that money isn't everything

Thank you python team

[–] libertyoftheforest@lemmy.wtf 32 points 1 day ago (9 children)

That's right. Fuck anti-DEI. DEI is the future and good.

[–] PKscope@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

DEI, otherwise known as hiring the right person for the job, regardless of label. It's wild that meritorious hiring principles aren't the norm in this country. Have to find out what you are before who you are matters.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

Uncritical application of DEI methods without due consideration for the objectives isn't reasonable.

But signing a contract that says "if you do anything we can construe as DEI we can demand payback of all the support you falsely relied on" is like stepping on a landmine and hoping the fuse stops working before you have to step off.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 77 points 2 days ago

The Seattle zoo also rejected federal funding with these strings. My wife lost her job because of it. Because it was just for one program and the no-DEI was organization wide…

Apparently the Portland Zoo signed it… No one expected that shit. We both let her parents know that this is because of their vote in another state.

[–] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 97 points 2 days ago (4 children)

There's an often repeated theme in philosophy that any gift that comes with conditions is actually just business.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I would use the term extortion, but yup.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago

Good for them. It is good to see people do something right for once.

[–] daslfc@lemmy.world 70 points 2 days ago (2 children)

In 2 days the White House will order every companie to stop using python because of woke or something

[–] ebolapie@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Imagining all the llm dorks suddenly trying to learn typescript over the weekend

[–] daslfc@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

It makes me very happy to think about

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 297 points 2 days ago (9 children)

One of our geology grants got hit for mentioning mineral inclusion. Total clown show.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 153 points 2 days ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 8 points 1 day ago

An administration that uses LLMs and Ctrl + F and vibes for policy decisions that don't sound good even before you realize they don't make sense, and ignores courts and due process... it's a hazard to touch.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 344 points 2 days ago

Hey look someone with integrity, morals, principles and balls. Sadly all four of those seem to be highly endangered traits.

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 116 points 2 days ago
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 240 points 2 days ago

I’m deeply proud of Python for standing by its community and making the right decision.

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 40 points 2 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 50 points 2 days ago (1 children)

After growing up watching things like Bill Nye, seeing names like the NSF saying shit like this is like an actual fucking nightmare reality. It's just so incredibly wrong.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago

The python foundation should have asked them to define the terms of the contract in a document. At least that way we would have had a legal definition of what woke means in their eyes. Because I'm reasonably confident that even they don't know.

[–] obinice@lemmy.world 155 points 2 days ago (7 children)

How is it legal to basically say "We'll give you some money if you promise to keep the blacks out of your organisation"

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Because Congress and the Supreme Court have been captured entirely by fascists.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 89 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Fucking hell, good for the PSF for maintaining their values. I'll make a donation when I get paid. I'm sure they would appreciate it if any one else can spare a dollar or two.

https://psfmember.org/civicrm/contribute/transact/?reset=1&id=2

Edit: Added donation link

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 111 points 2 days ago (1 children)

To make matters worse, the terms included a provision that if the PSF was found to have voilated that anti-DEI diktat, the NSF reserved the right to claw back any previously disbursed funds, Crary explained.

Likely why it was not accepted

[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 92 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, even if they weren't willing to take a principled stance, that's really dangerous. Especially with how temperamental these fascists are.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›