this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2024
244 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

59534 readers
3199 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jecht360@lemmy.world 104 points 9 months ago (6 children)

This just screams "stupid new CEO obsessed with trying to implement AI into everything".

[–] HuntressHimbo@lemm.ee 66 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't dismiss this just yet. Mozilla has already been doing some open source AI work, specifically their speech offerings. If they invest in these and they get better I think we all stand to gain from having good text to speech and speech recognition available outside of Apple/Amazon/Microsoft/Google

[–] errer@lemmy.world 30 points 9 months ago

Also my understanding is they’d use AI for local language translation so it doesn’t have to connect to some external server to do it.

Just cause for-profit organizations are heavily pushing AI doesn’t mean there aren’t unskeezy uses for it…

[–] ThiefUserPermissions@lemmy.myserv.one 21 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Im so sick of AI being inserted into every inane thing. Next it will be AI lego, AI gaming chair, AI toilet seat. Its just so fucking droll at this point. There is literally no technology I want to use less than your idiot pet AI project you just came up with. Everything now has AI in it yet nothing feels revolutionary or interesting. Its all just worse. Everything is just worse but with AI in it. Its just CEOs piling shit on top of shit on top of shit and expecting something beautiful to come out the other end. Drives me nuts.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago

The worst part is they still barely understand how to get AI to actually do anything. So it's always just "yo dawg, we heard you like ChatGPT, so we put ChatGPT in your car so you can chat while you drive"

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 months ago

The only good use I can think of is generating simple readable summaries of ad and picture heavy pages.

A bit like spam filters, to make the Web usable.

Could be an advantage similar to what Opera had in olden days.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 69 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Compared to the blockchain type train, I thought this whole AI thing was quite cool and actually useful, but it feels more and more similar to the blockchain hype, where companies tried to solve every problem with some form of blockchain (for example in-game items).

The same is kind of happening with AI now.

[–] nature_man@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)

Also, a large amount of those NFT bros have lately been pushing to allow AI companies to steal artist's works and otherwise generally licking big AI companies' collective boot, so not exactly a great look for the future of the industry

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago

The same is kind of happening with AI now.

Time and time again a certain intellectual category of people believes that they have found perpetuum mobile in their lives.

And some others make money on that, of course.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

It's just to boost investor confidence. It'll take a few years before it dies down, the true value is understood and the next buzzword takes hold. Sad state of tech these days. Many grifters, many more losers.

[–] Fake4000@lemmy.world 62 points 9 months ago (3 children)

They will be shoving AI / ML into Firefox. FFS.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago

Please God no.

[–] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Guess what, the local private translations feature depends on AI/ML. All this blind hate for AI is so stupid.

[–] banghida@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago

The new translation feature is quite awesome.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

People are incapable of not thinking in binary terms.

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's the new cool thing to hate it.

[–] nature_man@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

No. There are hundreds of entirely valid reasons to be wary of AI, especially the fact that the word AI has just turned into a corporate buzzword, when I hear that (insert thing) has had AI added to it, that can mean anything from a single static image that was made using "AI art" , to a large language model being used, or maybe they just grafted chatGPT to it.

Maybe if people and companies stopped labeling everything even tangentially computer related as AI I'd be less dismissive of it, but as it is now, whenever "AI" is mentioned in relation to a product it feels like a "corp wants to artificially increase percieved value by using latest trend" moment

[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

What is wrong with companies showing that they do work with this kind of stuff. They probably do already but they are just letting the people know that they do and it just happened the word AI sends that message. Though Mozilla downsizing is a bad thing and the job loss would be a valid reason. But from the thread I'm not seeing that kind of atmosphere here.

[–] refreeze@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago (3 children)
[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 36 points 9 months ago

Or, you know, clicking a button in the settings to turn it off.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] BumbleBeeButt@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 32 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Absolutely, but probably not until they have figured out how to make soft androids.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You'll still have to wash it and maintenance it after, eh, spikes in usage.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 months ago

They’ll likely be self cleaning tbh.

[–] bloopernova@programming.dev 32 points 9 months ago (1 children)

At least the code is open, and Librewolf works great.

[–] Infiltrated_ad8271@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Edit: I'm going to rephrase this so as not to divert it on the misinterpretation of a particular case.

Librewolf doesn't check anything, it just applies patches automatically. That's why sometimes bugs happen, like corrupting the user profiles of all flatpak users a year ago; entirely the fault of librewolf for not updating a line of code, and not of any third party.

[–] LucidNightmare@lemm.ee 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you read into it, it was because the users Software Manager chose to downgrade from v108 > v107. I wouldn’t knock this on the Librewolf team, although I don’t use it, so there could be other issues I wouldn’t know about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago (2 children)

You know, I’m surprised they haven’t launched a paid for, privacy centric email service like Proton or FastMail. They can give basic service for free and then charge a nominal fee for more storage like the others do. It seems like a simple way to drum up some revenue and rely a little less on the payment from Google.

[–] shadow@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

From everything I've heard about running a reliable and trustworthy email service, it sounds like a fucking nightmare. I'm glad to pay something like proton to handle it for me.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dco@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Wouldn't really consider Fastmail privacy centric, but Proton sure. And a definite step up from Gmail.

[–] DrAnthony@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago (3 children)

So Thunderbird is super dead this time huh?

[–] flamingos@ukfli.uk 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Isn't Thunderbird completely self-managed? I don't think they have anything to do with MozCorp.

[–] Desistance@lemmy.world 14 points 9 months ago

Yes. MZLA Technologies Ltd. is separate from Mozilla Corporation.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I'm hoping the K-9 Android thing still happens.

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I think they may be dumping all the rest of the code on the FOSS team.

[–] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Welp, using the internet was fun while it lasted. I'll still use Firefox for all my browsing until I can't anymore and after that I guess I'll go fuck myself for entertainment instead of internet browsing.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 1 points 9 months ago

Gemini still exists.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 9 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


After installing a new interim CEO earlier this month, Mozilla, the organization behind the Firefox browser, is making some major changes to its product strategy, TechCrunch has learned.

Specifically, Mozilla plans to scale back its investment in a number of products, including its VPN, Relay and, somewhat remarkably, its Online Footprint Scrubber, which launched only a week ago.

Going forward, the company said in an internal memo, Mozilla will focus on bringing “trustworthy AI into Firefox.” To do so, it will bring together the teams that work on Pocket, Content and AI/Ml.

Mozilla started expanding its product portfolio in recent years, all while its flagship product, Firefox, kept losing market share.

And while the organization was often sharply criticized for this, its leadership argued that diversifying its product portfolio beyond Firefox was necessary to ensure Mozilla’s survival in the long run.

Firefox, after all, provided the vast majority of Mozilla’s income, but it also meant the organization was essentially dependent on Google to continue this deal.


The original article contains 234 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 29%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

I didn't think they were trying to hide it?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 months ago

I don’t get the hate. Browsers are one of the few places LLMs make actual sense.

[–] nerd_E7A8@programming.dev 5 points 9 months ago

So, how much time do I have before I have to switch to Servo?

[–] Engywuck@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

Mozilla Corp. acting as any other Corp. Unbelievable /s

load more comments
view more: next ›