this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
430 points (84.0% liked)

Memes

54215 readers
657 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 60 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Can we get a victims of capitalism memorial foundation?

[–] djsaskdja@reddthat.com 45 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago

Also many victims just permanently disappeared from history

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, but not until after the revolution.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 1 month ago (3 children)

wasn’t there an org that counted nazi soldiers killed by the red army, as well as aborted babies in socialist countries, as "victims of communism"?

[–] RiverRock@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 month ago

It gets dumber: they also counted soviets killed by nazis in ww2 and the hypothetical children that dead eastern front nazis never had as victims of communism

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 month ago

Yup, and they're used as the foundational source for Soviet death toll. Wikipedia uses them, even.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

Learn today when listening to MapleTakes on Twitch (Canada Comrade). Canada has a "Victims of Communism" monument that they put up. Here is a picture of it blacked out like it's the Epstein files.

They had to black it out because people kept realizing they were all fucking Nazis.

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/2025/12/17/canada-monument-victims-communism-no-names-nazi-controversy

[–] mathemachristian@hexbear.net 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

> victims of communism monument
> empty

god tier bit

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago

Should have left those names, but etch a little swastika next to every Nazi.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 30 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Sure, the USSR did kill a lot of Nazis. But to claim all of the victims of communism were Nazis is bullshit

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Victims of Communism is a specific propaganda campaign from various right wing orgs. Hence the capitalization. It attempts to draw an equivalence to mass murder performed by right wing regimes in order to delegitimize left alternative. All the while pushing right wing agendas. It's also why such memorials often feature nazis as victims. A recent example.

[–] bunchberry@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It is the academic consensus even among western scholars that the Ukrainian famine was indeed a famine, not an intentional genocide. This is not my opinion, but, again, the overwhelming consensus even among the most anti-communist historians like Robert Conquest who described himself as a "cold warrior." The leading western scholar on this issue, Stephen Wheatcroft, discussed the history of this in western academia in a paper I will link below.

He discusses how there was strong debate over it being a genocide in western academia up until the Soviet Union collapsed and the Soviet archives were open. When the archives were open, many historians expected to find a "smoking gun" showing that the Soviets deliberately had a policy of starving the Ukrainians, but such a thing was never found and so even the most hardened anti-communist historians were forced to change their tune (and indeed you can find many documents showing the Soviets ordering food to Ukraine such as this one and this one).

Wheatcroft considers Conquest changing his opinion as marking an end to that "era" in academia, but he also mentions that very recently there has been a revival of the claims of "genocide," but these are clearly motivated and pushed by the Ukrainian state for political reasons and not academic reasons. It is literally a propaganda move. There are hostilities between the current Ukrainian state and the current Russian state, and so the current Ukrainian state has a vested interest in painting the Russian state poorly, and so reviving this old myth is good for its propaganda. But it is just that, state propaganda.

Discussions in the popular narrative of famine have changed over the years. During Soviet times there was a contrast between ‘man-made’ famine and ‘denial of famine’.‘Man-made’ at this time largely meant as a result of policy. Then there was a contrast between ‘man-made on purpose’, and ‘man-made by accident’ with charges of criminal neglect and cover up. This stage seemed to have ended in 2004 when Robert Conquest agreed that the famine was not man-made on purpose. But in the following ten years there has been a revival of the ‘man-made on purpose’ side. This reflects both a reduced interest in understanding the economic history, and increased attempts by the Ukrainian government to classify the ‘famine as a genocide’. It is time to return to paying more attention to economic explanations.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326562364

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (42 children)

Yes, there was a famine in the 1930s. It was largely due to adverse weather conditions, coupled with the bourgeois farmers called "kulaks" killing their livestock and burning their crops to resist the Red Army collectivizing agriculture. However, to paint those who died as "victims of communism" when the communists were the ones that finally ended famine in a region where famine was historically common and regular is hardly genuine.

The term "Holodomor," the right-wing theory describing a man-made and intentional famine, was created by Ukrainian nationalists in the 80s. It was named as such to draw direct connection to the Holocaust, and as such is a form of Holocaust trivialization. Archival evidence proves that there was no such intentional famine, but it is used politically to demonize socialism in the real world, wielded like a club.

load more comments (42 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I wonder if anyone has a number on how many people capitalism has killed.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 20 points 1 month ago

Ws of Communism

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Also the babies that were never conceived due to women in socialist countries getting silly things like rights, bodily autonomy, and careers. According to that one black book.

[–] Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com 15 points 1 month ago (38 children)

I've already thought of this quite a bit and reached a conclusion, that I like to call "the gulag museum problem".

As a communist myself: many people were brought unjustly to prisons in the hardest years of the USSR and suffered greatly there, probably hundreds of thousands of innocents. Should there be a museum dedicated to them? Yes.

However, this is focusing on one event in one particular difficult time of history in one particular socialist country. If we start counting the victims of capitalism and colonialism, and compare to communism, we will reach astonishing numbers. The problem is therefore not the existence of the gulag museum: the problem is that for every gulag museum, there should be 20 museums about the victims of capitalism/imperialism/colonialism.

load more comments (38 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›