this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2025
363 points (98.7% liked)

Not The Onion

19599 readers
528 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fake videos show frustrated, unmarried, childless middle-aged women crying and venting in hospital hallways about their life choices.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nymnympseudonym@piefed.social 168 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Shaming people into having kids works so well

They rush to have children who are then cherished and not resented

/s

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 55 points 1 month ago (6 children)

The one child policy really gonna be up there with killing all the sparrows long term...

It was in place 45 years and only gone a decade.

You can't just flip a cultural switch and expect them to become bunnies overnight. And that's not even getting into the economic part.

Kids are fucking expensive.

When workers aren't paid well, people stop having kids. That shrinks labor supply in a generation, workers can command enough pay to have kids, and population will stabilize.

The wealthy hate populations dropping, because they have the luxury to plan ahead and know eventually it leads to more powerful workers.

It's why it's a constant boogeyman and reproduction has been prioritized thru virtually all of recorded human history.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] butwhyishischinabook@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Good thing the government, led by the vanguard and guided by the Immortal Science, wisely choose to implement a one child policy for so long.

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 132 points 1 month ago (5 children)

My parents and extended family: "why don't you find a nice girl to [blah blah blah]"

Me: "haha yes I'll get right on that"

Me: having mega gay sex in addition to actively not wanting children, even if I was medically a good candidate to father them

Parents/extended: "I just don't understand"

Me: upgrades to ultra mega gay sex

[–] PhobosAnomaly@feddit.uk 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Out of curiosity, what is the second level upgrade or evolution?

asking for a friend

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)

it goes gay, gayra, gayraga, gayraja

[–] four@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 month ago

You know my straight ass is spamming that button to prevent it from evolving into gayraga

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Ultra Mega Gay Sex Pro Max FE Special Edition+

[–] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 1 month ago

I imagine that Xi probably doesn't care all that much whether you're having mega gay sex, but I expect that he is very interested in whether you are also employing that dingus in ways more-conducive to sustaining future state output.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 83 points 1 month ago (1 children)

~~Childless~~, child free.

[–] IamtheMorgz@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is such an important distinction, tbh

[–] damnedfurry@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

They're each trying to put their own spin on it, there is no actual distinction in the words, just in the subtext/implication.

The former implies it's a lacking of a necessary thing, the latter implies it's the avoidance of an unnecessary burden. It's completely subjective whether a child is one or the other to someone.

It's a broadcast of one's own biases to consider either of these terms more 'valid' than the other.

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 month ago

At the very least, if you're trying to persuade to have kids, people who have chosen to not have kids, those people are not childless, they are child free. Their will is to be without child. They are not failing at having kids, they are succeeding at not having them.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's a broadcast of one's own biases to consider either of these terms more 'valid' than the other.

You seem to misunderstand. No one is saying one term is more valid than the other. They are different words meant to describe different people.

A person that doesn't want children, and doesn't have any, is considered childfree.

A person that wants children, but doesn't have any, is considered childless.

Since these parents are trying to convince their children to have kids, said children are clearly childfree, not childless. A childless person that wants children wouldn't need convincing

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 61 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fight fire with fire. Time for the Chinese Kids to start spamming their parents with AI-gen'd videos of Men and Women regretting getting married.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

Cheaper to just interview random couples.

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 month ago

Or old people crying that their kids don't talk to them anymore because they were not kind to their kids.

[–] ignirtoq@feddit.online 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What ghouls. Let people live the lives they want.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

what if being shitty to their kids is how they want to live ?

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Parents (not being able to tell the videos are AI-generated): "See this? This will be you in 30 years if you don't get married and have kids very soon!"

Kids (able to see the videos are visit AI-generated): "Suuuuure!"

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 month ago

The fact that it's AI generated tells the kids that it doesn't happen in real life.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

Nice to know the ungodly toxic, overbearing and boundryless parent is a universal phenomenon.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 34 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why would anyone in their right mind bring a child into this chaos right now? Humans probably need a good ole fashioned hard reset. First we need to fix oil dependency and the climate. That's a start.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Chinese Nationalists are probably feeling more powerful than ever before. Imagine MAGA but worse, because their supreme leader has been around for longer and their party has been around for lifetimes.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 30 points 1 month ago

Humanity priced itself out of the market.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

AI is a shit show.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 18 points 1 month ago (13 children)

How is life in China actually? There must be a reason people don't want children. I imagine work culture, bad pay, bad prospects, and inability to secure housing are top among the reasons.

[–] coherent_domain@infosec.pub 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not that I am disagreeing with your assessment, but I think low child brith rate is pretty universal in developed country.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_total_fertility_rate

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, education is a big factor in reduced birth rate, but I doubt it's the biggest factor. If educated people lived in societies with good conditions for raising and bearing children, I imagine they would make the informed decision to get children.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 15 points 1 month ago (3 children)

There must be a reason people don’t want children.

Yeah, kids cry and shit a lot. You don't need a reason not to want them, you need a reason to have them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

NYT put out a video 3 weeks ago covering a few guys that couldn't get women. The video says there's 30 million more men than women in the country due to the one child policy.

But that figure could be inflated

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MBech@feddit.dk 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

None of those reasons are why I decided not to have children. My reason is: my wife and I like to play computer 8 hours per day when we got home from work.

[–] one_step_behind@quokk.au 3 points 1 month ago

I believe China has too much housing right now. But the rest seems to be reason enough.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Maybe work on fixing that 16% youth unemployment rate, think that'll work a lot better then showing them slop

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snader@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Absolutely unhinged lol

[–] MissJinx@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

Worst than going to the hospital alone and spending old age alone is doing that after doing all the work of having kids. I will be alone and I'm taking care of that but I know people relying on children that don't give a fuck about them.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I would lose so much respect for my parents if they used an AI generated video to try and convince me of something.

[–] NewDayRocks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Would you respect your parents more of they paid actors and a cameraman to create the video instead?

[–] fiddlesticks@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 weeks ago

At least then they put some effort into it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 month ago

china's long history of controlling their ~~citizens’~~ prisoners’ reproduction

[–] MiddleAgesModem@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gustofwind@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Have a feeling this will backfire simply because comedy

[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago
[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 5 points 1 month ago

Hopefully this is about as effective as the war on drugs, because the world needs less children.

load more comments
view more: next ›