this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026
528 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

81534 readers
4451 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] wuffah@lemmy.world 158 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Sexuality is a human right, and controlling sexuality is an authoritarian tactic to manufacture compliance.

“Age verification” is not just a tool for elimination of Internet privacy, it’s also a tool for sexual control.

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Someone has been reading 1984… I’m not disagreeing with you, just saying ‘hi fellow doom reader’.

[–] danh2os@piefed.social 67 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago

2026 - 1984 = 42

o__O

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 108 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Hey I heard that theres a Very Pretty Neat trick for Brits to "travel abroad" effortlessly

[–] SlacksMcTavish@lemmy.ml 70 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

House of Lords voted for age verification on VPNs. Not for them of course.....

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 31 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

So rent a VPS abroad and run your own VPN from it. Comercial VPNs have a business to maintain so they've got to comply to keep operating and public advertising, but a privately run VPN just for yourself is just another TLS connection in a sea of other traffic.

[–] SlacksMcTavish@lemmy.ml 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm aware, got options set up. But the vast majority of people? It's not all about me like.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Give it a bit of time and you'll need a license to use a VPN. Without a license, your ISP can snitch in you. Unless you use starlink.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Your ISP could snitch on you for tons of 'illegal' traffic, but they don't because that would require deep packet inspection on an absurd amount of traffic and they gain nothing for it. Instead they pass on notices when they receive them from third parties, and take enforcement actions (like cutting off their service to you) only when they're directed to. They want your money after all.

Torrenting for example; only gets flagged when copyright holders join torrent trackers, then send letters to ISPs that control the IPs found in those groups. That's not the ISP hunting you down, they're just passing on a legal notice they've been given and thus are obligated to pass it to you.

From and ISPs perspective; a VPN connection doesn't look any different than any other TLS connection, ie https. There's nothing for them to snitch because a) they can't tell the difference without significant investment to capture and perform deep analysis on traffic at an absurd scale and b) they have no desire to even look and then snitch on customers, that just costs them paying customers.

The ONLY reason this can be enforced at all, is because comercial VPN companies want to advertise and sell their services to customers; so lawmakers can directly view and monitor those services.

Lawmakers have no way of even knowing about, let alone inspecting an individuals private VPN that's either running from private systems or from a foreign VPS.


All that's not even touching things like SSH tunneling - in a sense, creating a VPN from an SSH connection; one of the most ubiquitous protocols for controlling server infrastructure around the globe. Even if traffic was inspected to find SSH connections, you CAN'T block this or you disrupt IT infrastructure at such an alarming scale there'd be riots.

[–] sorghum@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (5 children)

This is the UK. You need a licence for a TV. I almost would guarantee that this is happening

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago

Then we just need a hero to route all our traffic through the House of Lords.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

A bunch of VPNs are owned by Israel. A bunch of them are also data brokers.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 11 points 3 weeks ago

Doesn't matter. Chinese people found a way around the firewall, pretty sure there are nerds in UK that will find a way.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Maestro@fedia.io 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Not really. They just announced they want to age gate VPNs too.

[–] r8KNzcU8TzCroexsE2xbWC@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 weeks ago

So I guess no more internships at companies with more than one office.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

China doesn't even really allow VPNs at all, yet some people can still go over the firewall.

If it's just "age restriction", I'm sure there will suddenly be a lot of grandpa/grandmas buying VPNs¹

¹When China tried to restrict online video games, kids just used their grandparents IDs for verification lmfao

[–] timwa@lemmy.snowgoons.ro 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

China's VPN blocking is actually very, very effective, and the vast majority of people don't go around it.

And that's kinda the point - the controls don't have to be 100%, they just have to cover the majority. And for the few that do circumvent - well, that's just one more easy crime for the authorities to charge you with if they ever feel the need.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] warm@kbin.earth 85 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Good job UK, you will push children to dangerous unmoderated sites instead! All in the name of state surveillance!

[–] manualoverride@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

This will lead to, sexual blackmail of children, suicide and financial fraud.

You should thank the UK for sacrificing so many of its citizens to show the world what peak government stupidity looks like. We thought the point was made with Brexit, but the UK says “hold my beer” one more time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 55 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (11 children)

If you live in the UK or in another country where porn is being restricted:

  • Talk with friends and family about getting a VPN (EDIT: Some recommendations I've heard are Air VPN, Private Internet Access, and, despite not having port forwarding, which is essentially one less major feature, Mullvad VPN. A thank-you to @jmf@lemmy.dbzer0.com for suggesting the former two.)
  • Learn to use the Tor network (it's really easy to start, and unlike popular belief, Tor isn't only for illegal activities)
  • Pressure MPs that didn't vote in favor of the age verification bill by sending emails to them about it so that they fight (or keep fighting) this age verification nonsense.

You don't need to be a porn addict to do these things. In fact, they have started with porn, but they may as well keep going and fight for age verification in other types of content, making access to said content way more difficult. The best thing you can do right now is to learn to fight back.

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

If you live in the UK or in another country where porn is being restricted: Talk with friends and family

Hmmmmm... Maybe not though

" Help me, stepbro. I can't access PornHub anymore 🥹 "

[–] UxyIVrljPeRl@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago

Im stuck in age-verification

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

UK is going to be requiring age verification for VPN access. https://reclaimthenet.org/uk-house-of-lords-votes-to-extend-age-verification-to-vpns

Will this mean all VPNs will comply? Obviously not, but the bigger names will either pull out or comply as we seeing with the bigger porn sites.

The next step after this will be criminalization of using a VPN without age verification.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jmf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 3 weeks ago (14 children)

Advertising for mullvad harms the peer2peer network. (They blocked port forwarding and won't be bringing it back)

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)

Yall may wanna step in and nip that kind of authoritarianism in the bud because it doesn't get easier when it's matured.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh no... Let's just Google what other porn sites are out there. Oh look 1,642,000 results found...

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 37 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's not the point. This is a protest by the company running these sites against a system that's not fit for its claimed purpose (age restriction of websites) but is very fit for surveillance.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

There calling it NoFap February.

I think it will be interesting to see what happens as a result of cuting a population off from porn.

[–] tino_408@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

They will just rely on illegal outlets now lol Can’t wait to see people locked up for porn lol one of the stupidest ways to spend government money lol

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Oi there bruv, you got a liosence for that there wank

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Texas did the same shit not long ago. VPN usage went through the roof, as expected.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 30 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

What would we even call a decentralized porn site?

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 51 points 3 weeks ago

circlejerk?

[–] SethTaylor@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago

I remember when you didn't have to have a VPN to enjoy the internet.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 21 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

This leaves citizens with a torrent of questions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

Tally ho chaps. God hates wankers.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 16 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Uk is even more puritanical than the US,

[–] shirro@aussie.zone 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's where the puritans came from.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

sorry I don't know what any of these things are

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Coz thats the only place porn exists

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So that's why that back mirror episode with the pig was set in the UK. They knew.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Looks like it were gonna go back to private VPNs with 10/20 people putting in each month to pay someone in a unrestricted area to run them a VPN.

Keep it small, make it look like enterprise kinda shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›