this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2026
1343 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

81286 readers
4152 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has criticized the European Union’s intentions to achieve digital sovereignty through open-source software. The company warned that Brussels’ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness. According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Kent Walker, Google’s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, warned of a competitive paradox that Europe is facing. According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement. His remarks came just days after the European Commission concluded a public consultation assessing the transition to open-source software.

Google’s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the “best technologies in the world.” Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

The EU is preparing a technological sovereignty package aimed at eliminating dependence on third-party software, such as Google’s. After reviewing proposals, it concluded that reliance on external suppliers for critical infrastructure entails economic risks and creates vulnerabilities. The strategy focuses not only on regulation but also on adopting open-source software to achieve digital sovereignty.

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users. Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.” As it did with the DMA and other laws, Google is playing on fear. Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

The promotion of open-source software aims to break dependence on foreign suppliers, especially during a period of instability caused by the Trump administration. The European Union has highlighted the risks of continuing under this system and proposes that public institutions should have full control over their own technology.

According to a study on the impact of open-source software, the European Commission found that it contributes between €65 billion and €95 billion annually to the European Union’s GDP. The executive body estimates that a 10% increase in contributions to open-source software would generate an additional €100 billion in growth for the bloc’s economy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev 2 points 1 hour ago

it stated that the creation of regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement.

"RaPiD tEcHnOlOgIcAl AdVaNcEmEnT", we all know what that is.

[–] notso@feddit.org 26 points 19 hours ago

Drug dealer critizes addict's intention to get clean.

[–] rfr_Foglia@feddit.it 27 points 20 hours ago

It means we're doing something right.

[–] MattGade@lemmy.world 15 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 9 points 19 hours ago

Fuck Alphabet, forever

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 23 points 22 hours ago

According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement.

Are we on a context of rapid technological advancement ? I would say we are in a context of dire technological stagnation.

«AI» is a mirage that is utterly failing at pretty much everything it is applied to, and in every other domain I would say tech progress is coming to a halt now that our new feudal lords have conquered so much of the market.

This push by the EU is, apart from digital sovereignty, a very necessary push to get some innovation going again. I hope more complementary measures will follow ; we really need hardware sovereignty as well.

[–] klay1@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago

bad for competition? If people want FOSS software, well go make a good product then!

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 day ago
[–] DevotedShitStain69@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago

Fuck Google!

[–] Concur6053@lemmy.today 29 points 1 day ago

Probably the most resounding endorsement they could hope for

[–] ParadoxSeahorse@lemmy.world 9 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TomArrr@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I did. Not advisable at work 😞

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 1 points 16 hours ago
[–] pimpampoom@lemmy.zip 9 points 23 hours ago

Let’s create open source even harder

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

Alarm Systems Bad For Business, Burglar Claims

[–] ReluctantlyZen@ani.social 5 points 22 hours ago

Lol, what competition? If anything this'll increase it, since suddenly, there's room for others.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Funny considering how much of Google was built on open software.

[–] arc99@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly. Open source is fine when it suits them but not fine when it doesn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To me it feels like there’s two Googles. The one that was run by Page and Brin was awesome, pretty much everyone in the industry wanted to work there.

Then they put someone else in charge to maximise shareholder revenue, and it went to shit soon after.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 5 points 23 hours ago

Public companies will always become so. They were only good because they were in the growth phase, the internet is not in the growth phase any longer, a few corporations control the gates to any industry, internet or what have you, and are squeezing everyone else.

Our wages go down every year in value as real inflation is higher than the cpi, while investors increase their margins at our expense. And we are too dumb to know it, trusting them, even now.

[–] i_love_FFT@jlai.lu 2 points 18 hours ago

suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the “best digital tools.”

While I read this section, my google-home powered radio stopped for no reason (just like it does often these days). I opened my home assistant control pannel and launched it again from there.

I'm looking forward to the day I finish my transition to 100% home assistant!

[–] C1pher@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

It's worth saying again: Google can fuck itself.

And I generally like Google's products. But they make plenty of money off of my data to say: Fuck Google.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

YSK that this is a) ragebait farming you for ad revenue and b) disinformation.

In the FT article referenced, there is no mention of open source.

Neither on his LI, which has a free access link to the FT article: https://www.linkedin.com/posts/kent-walker-5963bb198_google-warns-eu-against-erecting-walls-activity-7428100995995398144-I9Ac

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I’m going to throw that accusation of disinformation right back at you. He’s careful not to use the words “open source” verbatim, but it’s very clear what he’s talking about.

Every detail of the article is a fair summary of what he said, and you’re trying to pettifog over a string match.

load more comments (3 replies)

Not good for whose growth? Because it'll be perfectly fine for eu. The fact that google is upset about this, should be all the tell you need to know you're on the right path.

Car company complains that city is developing Metro system.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Tough shit, you supported the MAGA movement and Europe, thankfully, reacted accordingly. Simply put, the good folks in the EU lost faith in the USA.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

The good folks in the USA have lost faith in the USA. Alas, the bad folks remain in power. heh

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 91 points 1 day ago (1 children)

MoRe OpTiOnS iS bAd FoR cOmPeTiTiOn

[–] thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

competition is bad for competition

checks out

translation: having more competitors harms our chance of winning against them

[–] VeryVito@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Wolf decries Red Riding Hood for looking too closely at Granny.

More desperate pleas by Google. I just saw an article by some Google shill that made a case against self hosting. Next they'll try to make it illegal.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 60 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm not sure why anyone in EU, bloc or therefore canada should even care what an American company opinion would be at this point. They said they were moving on. They did.

[–] TerdFerguson@lemmy.world 62 points 1 day ago

The leopard of consequences is hungry for tech oligarch faces.

Eat, you majestic creature. And godspeed.

[–] ImitationLimitation@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 day ago
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 71 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember, whenever you see a patently weak argument like this from a trillion dollar corporation, they’re not saying it because they think anyone will believe it. They’re saying it to give the corrupt politicians in their pocket some way to pull a straight face when voting in the corporation’s favour.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DigDoug@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

I criticise Emma Stone's plan not to sleep with me.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 74 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Wrong.

creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement

Wrong.

Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms

What does he not understand about digital sovereignty?

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users

No, for Google. Also, wrong.

that the market moves faster than legislation and warns, that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls “the most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.”

If that's the price to avoid technofaschism... And, again, wrong.

Tl;dr: stop wanking, Walker.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Adalast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

In other news: fire is hot, water makes things wet, and things that taste good make us happy.

[–] xeekei@lemmy.zip 66 points 1 day ago

Fuck you, Google.

[–] Itwasntme223@discuss.online 16 points 1 day ago

Google is secretly panicking cause they lost an entire nation bloc. That's gotta hurt the pocket book somewhere.

[–] schema@lemmy.world 86 points 1 day ago

Thanks for confirming we're on the right track, google.

[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 34 points 1 day ago

How DARE they try to ELIMINATE our Services after ALL the MONEY we Poured in Donald Trump's POCKETS!

[–] aqua@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 day ago

really fun fuck you google

[–] maplesaga@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

If Europe cares about climate change they will force carriers to open source their firmware. Why should a phone be allowed to be non-updateable?

[–] rageagainstmachines@lemmy.world 125 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"Drug dealer criticizes drug user's plan to quit."

load more comments (2 replies)

We literally removed "don't be evil" from our mission statement, but you can totally trust us, bro.

Google

load more comments
view more: next ›