this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
114 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

81286 readers
4458 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Security researchers have discovered more than 300 Chrome extensions that leak browser data, spy on their users, or outright steal users’ data.

Research focused on the analysis of network traffic generated by Chrome extensions has uncovered 287 applications transmitting the user’s browsing history or search engine results pages (SERP).

Some of them, security researcher Q Continuum explains, would essentially expose the data to unsecured networks, while others would send it to collection servers, either due to intended functionality, for monetization purposes, or with malicious intent.

The extensions have over 37.4 million users, the researcher says. Of these, roughly 27.2 million users installed 153 extensions that were confirmed to leak browser history upon installation.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Whirling_Cloudburst@lemmy.world 1 points 45 minutes ago

Here is the actual important stuff.

[–] JerryMerweather@piefed.social 20 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Yet, instead of fixing the moderation problem they have, they just focus on targeting adblockers, because removing pornographic ads HaRmS the EcOnOmY and the ChiLDerN!!1

They even made another entire manifest version to make adblockers perform worse, but no real changes to moderation.

[–] Linearity@piefed.zip 2 points 4 hours ago

And boy does it SUCK
Barely changes anything in terms of security

[–] RedFrank24@piefed.social 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What, is Google upset about having some competition?

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago

Yes. 300 second places, who cares? Maybe there's an aftermarket for data Google already has stolen. Might be that Google's prices are too high for resellers.

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Couldn't be happier for having dumped Chrome for Vivaldi.

[–] foggenbooty@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Good for you! I got fed up with Chrystler and I'm never buying from them again. From now on I'm only buying Dodge!

/s

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Genuinely asking: what's the alternative?

[–] MasterBlaster@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Firefox and hardened forks, possibly Cromite. All you can do is harden your defenses as much as possible and try not to go "oooooo shiny" when looking at extensions.

[–] CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

I do use Firefox as my secondary browser. I may have been under an inaccurate impression that Vivaldi was more private and secure (with a built-in ad blocker)