this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2026
56 points (98.3% liked)

Games

46508 readers
885 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenBeanMachine@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I can't remember the last time I bought a game more expensive than $20. If you price it higher, I will just pirate it. Fuck your greed, you could have had 20, but now you'll get nothing

[–] Novamdomum@fedia.io 8 points 2 hours ago

£70 for a game was never justifiable. In the last 5 years these have been my most expensive purchases:

£27 Eriksholm: The Stolen Dream (Finished it - Superb game!) £50 Assassin's Creed Shadows (Played 6hrs - REGRET! Won't ever spend that much on a game again) £26 Manor Lords (Played 4 hours - REGRET!) £28 No Rest For The Wicked (Played 8hrs - Will play more) £28 Tower Simulator 3 (Played 19hrs - Superb game!) £34 X-Plane 12 (Played 8hrs - REGRET!)

Now... people who PRE-purchase games for £70... That's truly mind boggling.

[–] 58008@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

My parents paid about that much for a SNES copy of Earthworm Jim back in the mid-90s. It was disgusting then and it's disgusting now, despite the fact that, adjusted for inflation, that would be £140 today. I mean I don't feel like we're getting a 50% discount when a game costs 70 fuckin' quid nowadays.

There's really no reason to spend that anyway, not on PC at least. IsThereAnyDeal.com and the slightly questionable loaded.com (formerly cdkeys.com) give decent discounts even on day one (and Steam itself will eventually have it on sale, of course). Loaded isn't like G2A, which is a credit card thief's wonderland. It's more like when your uncle Jim crosses the border with 40 cartons of cigarettes secreted in the wheel wells of his truck because they cost 400% less over there. I can live with that level of mischief when it comes to AAA games that take the absolute piss with their prices and their hostage DLCs. EA, Ubisoft and Rockstar have not caused me a millisecond of lost sleep when I get their games for £3 six months after release from a code that was originally bundled with a new GPU. With how extremely easy it is to pirate games (something I haven't done in nearly 20 years), I don't feel like those larger AAA companies are meeting us half way, to say the fucking least.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 35 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I've got 150 games in my backlog. I am happy to wait a year or longer until a hundred dollar buggy piece of shit game becomes a polished, discounted 25 dollar game.

[–] Drasglaf@sopuli.xyz 8 points 3 hours ago

Or at least a discounted buggy piece of shit game that might be worth trying, they don't fix most of those nowadays. Although sailing the high seas would probably the best course of action for such games.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I will admit, I've only ever paid that amount for three games ever. Voices of the Void, EOD Tarkov and the Founders edition of Soulframe, and the only reason I did that was to support the devs.

Making $100 a baseline cost for a brand new game, where the AAA companies have decided "oh you can do patches to fix bugs in the first couple of weeks without losing too much money." Is the standard (which came first, the chicken or the egg?) is absolutely ludicrous.

I remember when Gran Turismo 4 was an expensive game because it was 40. But that worked right out of the box; you pay for it, put the CD in and bam. Fully working game. That you own. Forever.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 10 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Meanwhile speculation grew from a 2025 report by gaming industry advisory company Epyllion that the next Grand Theft Auto will be the first game to be priced at $100, paving the way for others to either follow suit or at least contemplate a price hike.

I guess I have to wait a few years till it gets down to 30€ or so. That's manageable.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

They've monetized GTAV so thoroughly via Online that they've given the game (including single player) away for free because they still made a profit off of it.

Charging $100 for a sequel they'll definitely monetize even worse is the epitome of greed.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 5 points 4 hours ago

I fully expect gacha mechanics in the sequel.

Pull for Niko Bellic! Only available for one month! 0.1% drop rate, but pity triggers at 150 pulls!

[–] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

$100 today is about $40 in 1990. In those days games were made by a handful of people or even a single individual in one of two years of development. Chris Sawyer started work on the 1994 classic Transport Tycoon in 1992 and wrote the entire codebase in x86 Assembly. The price isn't really that crazy considering the comparatively massive undertaking that is GTA6 development.

Having said that, it's rare nowadays for any AAA game to release anywhere near its best state, so it tends to be worth it to wait even if money isn't the concern.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

GTAV has made over ten billion dollars, one billion of that in its first three days. They would have earned more than double its entire lifetime development costs (estimated at ~200-250 million) if they'd charged a twentieth of what they did.

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

I get one full priced game maybe once every two or three years. Most of the time, Steam sales are my friend.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 6 points 4 hours ago

I never justified it. Cheaper indie games have always been here.