this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
714 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

81869 readers
5040 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] J92@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

The only useful thing ive found for AI is its ability to read text from an image. Which is good for taking serial numbers from a photo, and copying from an app that otherwise doesnt allow copying on phone. Thats it. A tool.

[–] azvasKvklenko@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

I also find LLMs decent for translating text between languages, though for serious use it still requires human review

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

that function is just reskinned OCR, though

which I guess you could consider as AI and that it is a similar training data structure? not my area lol

I do also think that AI has some use as a search engine. I haven't used it much for this purpose at all, but a while back there was a specific type of engineering analysis I needed to do, and I couldn't remember the exact terms or topics to look up. chat GPT got me into the right area so I could look at the appropriate resources. in that specific scenario, it was better than a standard search engine

Of course once I found the materials I was looking for, I stopped using the chat bot and you know use those materials

[–] Dazed_Confused@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

So while previously the translation feature was supported by an extension, now it has to be enabled through ai.

Hate it.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago

Browsers don't need LLMs

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The only people that are into LLMs are scientist (which is reasonable) and tech bros.

The later just think it's useful while for 99% of people there just isn't a usecase.

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 1 points 1 hour ago

I guess I'm in both groups. I love LLMs, but then again I have academic degree in AI.

Though I must also admit - look how they massacred my boy. LLMs could be used in games to make every NPC a talkative character or work as a customer support during off-hours of small businesses... instead they are used to generate advertisements faster.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 7 points 3 hours ago

Im super happy to see so many upvotes for this most excellent browser!

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 14 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Remember when they had a "kill switch" for javascript?

[–] SpeakerToLampposts@lemmy.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

Yeah. Used to be native. Like the slop kill switch currently is. Then won't be.

[–] InternetPerson@lemmings.world 49 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

"Kill switch" – oh the drama. Let's call every simple toggle 'kill switch' from now on.

[–] blinfabian@feddit.nl 12 points 8 hours ago

i have a violently execute switch in my room (it toggles the lamp on or off)

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

For it to be a kill switch it would have to actually terminate a rogue AI.

[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yeah, call me when Firefox creates terminators that infiltrate and destroy data centers and then themselves.

[–] SuspciousCarrot78@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

What's worse....you could always toggle it. In fact, you could re-route it to your own local LLM.

Drama drama cheesecake drama

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 12 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

So, there's a "bug", though I expect to FF it's a feature: If you individually block all of the AI features, then click on the master switch to block all AI, everything's great. But if you revert that master switch suddenly it "forgets" all of your settings and shit is activated again.

It seems by design. And since it's opt in, if FF "accidentally" disables the master switch (I'm betting it will eventually) you lose that extra layer of protection. OH, and I had disabled EVERYTHING in registry (about:config) before this and translations were still available. I guess it's time for me to explore other FF-core options....

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Lmao, semi common design mistake? MUST BE INTENTIONAL!

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago

I don't think I'm being paranoid by saying it:

  • opt-out rollout of every AI feature

  • only slogging through registry to manual opt out until now

  • CEO and board hell bent on monetizing and delivering features users actively do not want. I.e., enshitification

  • I have seen my own AI registry changes revert already once after a patch

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

It's just a lazy/poor design.

Instead of each setting having its own bit with one 'override' bit, they just set override by setting each bit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›