this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2026
1066 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

83126 readers
3137 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] twjolson@lemmy.world 191 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Only one team working to make Teams worse???

[–] justsomeguy@lemmy.world 96 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

They have achieved higher productivity by not using teams themselves.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 56 points 3 weeks ago

You've got it reversed. Switching to Teams greatly hastened development, as the team's newfound vitriol and frustration could be channeled toward the end user in a neverending feedback loop.

[–] ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Literally! They were told to return to office to achieve higher productivity (it was circling the news around September?)

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It was obviously just a corpo stealth layoff but imagine being told as a Teams developer that Teams is not good enough for remote work

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 12 points 3 weeks ago

Just one team working on Teams, and they are doing their best to make it worse.

I for one encourage them, it apparently needs to be even worse before my work will consider changing

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lasta@piefed.world 123 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (10 children)

This is what I gathered on the subject, feel free to correct if anything is wrong:

The WiFi tracking works by scanning for nearby WiFi networks, identifying which routers are nearby and their signal strengths, matching those against their database of known WiFi access points, and using that data to estimate your location. 

For now the feature will be off by default, first has to be enabled by your company, and then the user has to opt in for it to be used.

For those who are required to use Microsoft products, it can by bypassed by using a wired Ethernet connection and not using Teams on any devices using a wireless connection.

Edit: As @lividweasel@lemmy.world pointed out, Microsoft is not using WiFi positioning systems to determine location, but rather updating your location to “in the office” or not depending on whether your device is connected to one of the organization’s WiFi SSIDs.

[–] nullPointer@programming.dev 23 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

same go for the web browser based teams, or is this just the "app"?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 48 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The browser version shouldn't be able to access this info.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Until Edge updates and silently turns it on

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] lumettaria@sopuli.xyz 98 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Tenant admins will decide whether to enable it and require end-users to opt-in."

If you require someone to opt-in, they're no longer "opting in"

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 27 points 3 weeks ago

But you clicked the terms and conditions popup, so you are our slave now.

[–] BigTurkeyLove@lemmy.dbzer0.com 75 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

So glad I only use Teams in a browser, fuck this bullshit.

Don't install Teams.

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 70 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Teams comes pre installed with windows these days.

I recommend KDE Plasma on any linux distribution that comes with it for people interested in recovering their digital sovereignty.

[–] QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

If people moved to Linux and used FOSS software, these privacy violations wouldn't even be a problem.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 38 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Most people who use teams do so on work devices, I can't just install Linux on it.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago

I cant even delete a shortcut on my work microslop machine

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 21 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

If people moved to Linux

When users connect to their organization's WiFi...

You think my employer would let me use Linux? Creeping on employees is how management feels important.

I wouldn't use Teams personally unless under extreme duress. Unfortunately professionally it is the norm.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago

Disable your laptop webcam and microphone, use headset instead. I'll be looking to see if I can switch to Teams web.

I remember how a subcontractor's company called me with a lot of private information I assume the subcontractor had spoken to them about. The subcontractor had no clue about it, which completely changed how I had been perceiving the situation. The problem is companies are using the excuse of keeping tabs on their workers to perform outright continuous surveillance on them and try to see how they can exploit any and all information they can salvage for their benefit, which becomes a problem when there is no clear division between personal and professional space.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

You can't even install it on Linux, they killed the native app years ago and now tell you to use the browser version

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

And then every link asks if you want to open in app, three extra clicks but worth it

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Prove_your_argument@piefed.social 71 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

I swear people do not understand the point of what microsoft does.

There isn't a team tasked with making teams worse. They're tasked with extracting all possible value out of their product. Part of that value is infromation like where you are, what you're doing, what you're talking about, what you search for, what you actually do for your job, who is around you, what they talk about, where they are, what they are doing, what they search for, and what they do for their job and how everyone spends their money.

All of this is incredibly valuable data to governments, businesses and private individuals that want to advertise, suppress dissenting political voices, enhance useful dissenting political voices, and otherwise manipulate global influence.

They just don't want you to think about declining any permissions, triggering regulatory action, or switching to another platform.

[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That's true. Their mission is not explicitly to make it worse, but to continually maximize value at all costs. Eventually, software usability has to be one of the costs.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 43 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

God damn it, at work they pay us to put that stuff on our personal phones... maybe I've been a bit too lenient on that, maybe I should get a work phone.

[–] Enekk@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Never, ever, cross the personal/work barrier. I have seen so much abuse when those lines cross.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I agree, but some places there's simply no option. I have a state job, they will under no circumstances provide a phone, but you must have Authenticator. If you won't or can't use a smartphone, you simply don't have a job.

State jobs are interesting. 3/4 the pay of a regular job, but job security like none other, and you barely have to do anything. I spend most of my time doing my moonlighting job to supplement my income.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is illegal in Norway :)

[–] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 weeks ago

And Germany.

[–] LedgeDrop@lemmy.zip 35 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Having Teams remind you that, during session recordings, your video and what you say can be used by Microsoft for whatever purpose they want, including (but not limited to) training AI.

This wasn't the line that was crossed? Seeing/hearing your likeness in the next generated AI / copilot commercial, because you needed to consent in order to work. This is "fine" /s

... but having Microsoft know that you're answering Teams messages while on the toilet... yeah, that's where "the line gets crossed" (eyeroll)

We need to wake-up and drop this technological cancer.

edit: a word

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] thatsnothowyoudoit@lemmy.ca 34 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I worked on a large(ish) contract (tens of millions) with one of Microsoft’s engineering teams where they were implementing an Azure managed version of software we produced. I would regularly refuse to install teams at the meetings, using teams in-browser only.

It also ensured that the technical project manager had to be the one to transcribe anything in our notes into whatever tools Microsoft was using.

While it was never said, the Microsoft engineers seemed to completely understand and never pushed back against my refusal to a) install crapware and b) not take on work that wasn’t mine.

Not using teams: win win.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (7 children)

I would regularly refuse to install teams at the meetings, using teams in-browser only.

I tried to do this for a safety meeting, Teams is also broken in browsers. I'm not sure if intentional or incompetence.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Fokeu@lemmy.zip 33 points 3 weeks ago

They've crossed the line a long long time ago. All microslop products are straight up unusable.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 33 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Microsoft: Our product is not our software. It's you!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

The users aren't the customers. The customers are the users' bosses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zink@programming.dev 25 points 3 weeks ago

My employer has the usual setup of M365 enterprise shit running on Dell laptops.

Fortunately we devs are able to "dual boot" to run Linux on our machines, since our product is an embedded Linux system. (has anybody seen my Windows partition btw? I can't even find anything NTFS formatted, whoopsie!)

All that background info is just so I can pay Microsoft a compliment, even if it has asterisks all over it:

The entire Microsoft suite works just fine in a browser, and in LibreWolf too! I do typically add some permissions for those sites for convenience, since librewolf is privacy/tracking hardened (firefox fork) out of the box. I use Teams and Outlook every day, and occasionally will drop a file into OneDrive or edit something in MS Office. I don't write many office-format documents though, so I'm more likely to be in LibreOffice or a PDF viewer just reading a doc.

You know how in media streaming and gaming there's that balance of whether it is more convenient to be a paying customer versus pirate everything?

Microsoft's stuff is literally better to use in Linux. Even if I need to test the Windows build of something, a VM is SO much more convenient. And I'm not even logged into the microsoft shit on that. If I need something from OneDrive, I go to the browser there too.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 22 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Honestly, I would screen potential employers by whether they are a Microsoft shop or not. Fuck ‘em.

[–] cole@lemdro.id 29 points 3 weeks ago

nice to have that sort of freedom, since the majority of companies use some Microsoft products

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

i thought the same, but now working at a place using google/slack/zoom isn’t much better. pretty much all corporate software is feature creep bloated slop these days.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder if the team that is tasked with making teams worse has team meetings with the whole team on teams.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deltaspawn0040@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 weeks ago

They are called stakeholders.

[–] TimeNaan@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago
[–] Solrac@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

And is why we don't use Microsoft products.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago

Probably the same pick me they put in charge of Xbox.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] dansel@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

You’re doubting Microsoft’s ability to make a product worse?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 15 points 3 weeks ago

There have been teams at Microsoft making everything worse since 1998. Why is this news?

[–] artyom@piefed.social 13 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Employees arent the ones paying for Teams, so why would they care? Teams could openly market itself as remote work surveillance tool for employers and they'd gobble that shit up.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago

So many other apps do this already, including the OS. This is changing your Teams status for you, so coworkers can see if you’re in the office or not.

If your hybrid wfh office has any sort of reservation system then this is likely already happening.

[–] masta_chief@sh.itjust.works 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I was gonna use teams for a few groups of people, but fuck this noise. What are the best alternatives? Something like slack or discord but those have their issues too

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›