this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2026
16 points (71.1% liked)

Technology

82250 readers
3984 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BladeFederation@piefed.social 16 points 23 hours ago

"What could be worse than MICROSOFT overseeing open source software? Wait no! It was a rhetorical question!"

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Was self-hosting gitlab or foregejo not an option?

[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They’ll probably just fork forgejo add some slight “ai agentic” bullshit and market it as their own product.

I was going to say hopefully the forgejo licence doesn’t allow that but then again, OpenAI have shown they don’t really care about copyright or anything like that

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Forgejo is licensed under GPLv3, so I think it isn't possible to do so

Correct me if I wrong, but the GPL has the weakpoint of web distribution in the sense that a backend is not shipped to the client, so you can keep a forked GPL product without publishing back. The AGPL was made for this (and the SSPL (I think) is like any network interface needed should be published too).

[–] mrmaplebar@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

It was but then how could they pitch that to investors?

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago

Those aren’t “agentic” enough.

[–] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I hope they call it "SlopTrough"

[–] Casterial@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why? Seems like a massive waste of resources. We already have several source controls

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Wasting resources is literally AI's main thing

[–] Casterial@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Lol true 😂

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Github is not source control

[–] Casterial@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, but there are so many other systems already out there that compete with it. Why reinvent the wheel when your company is already bleeding billions?

[–] Joelk111@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Gotta keep throwing shit at the wall.

[–] gilokee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago
[–] tias@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago