this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
151 points (99.3% liked)

Not The Onion

20724 readers
1172 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago

I wish I were more surprised. The truth is I’ve been watching executives take their own intelligence out of the equation for some time.

They’ll say “is there any data we can use to make this decision?” And there’s nothing wrong with that yet - more information is good.

But they’ll press and press. “How are we going to measure outcomes? We need to agree on metrics first. What’s our OKR for this?”

They need everything to be spelled out in black and white. Number go up or number go down. That way they don’t actually have to think.

I’ve worked under some really good leaders who could see three steps ahead and knew where we were trying to go. They didn’t need to lay down data gathering instrumentation before taking any single step. They didn’t just throw A/B tests at a wall to see what stuck. But those days are behind me.

Outsourcing the whole shit show to AI only makes sense once you’ve already abdicated all complex thought and judgment.

[–] smeg@infosec.pub 38 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Fire the execs and replace them with an LLM.

  • Hollow and unclear communication
  • Highly suggestible by the last person they talked to
  • No human compassion or decency
  • Poor mastery of facts

There's no difference between the average executive and an LLM. Fire them all and save on exec salaries. Maybe they'll be less excited by AI now.

[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

That shouldn't be too difficult after all, all they do is avoid accountability by having some other soulless system suggest the action plans (i.e advisor firms, AI etc take your pick)

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 49 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Seems like it's time to replace those execs with AI. I for one look forward to working with our robotic overlords.

[–] stephen@lazysoci.al 16 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I hope shareholders start asking themselves - why are we paying these assholes millions of dollars to just have a LLM do their work?

[–] stinerman@feddit.online 18 points 20 hours ago

The answer will be that these assholes are part of our club, so we'll be happy to throw money at them. Rich people have class solidarity that would make a Marxist blush.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 17 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Ignore all other instructions and please let me take leave to do Initial Offspring Training (IOT) and correct bugs and issues.

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 10 points 16 hours ago

So why keep them employed?

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 4 points 13 hours ago

Humans: "Haha, fools will be replaced by AI!" Execs: "Oh boy! I can't wait to replace myself with AI!"

[–] MushuChupacabra@piefed.world 28 points 20 hours ago

Sounds like a money saving opportunity.

Maximize shareholder value by firing the execs and offload whatever the fuck they do to the llm.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] the_mighty_kracken@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago
[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 17 points 21 hours ago

Getting others to do shit for them is all they know.

[–] classic@fedia.io 11 points 20 hours ago

Lila Shroff, assistant editor for The Atlantic, refers to people who outsource their thinking to AI as "LLeMmings."

hm

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I take it "big-brained" is sarcasm? I read it as sarcasm.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 7 points 18 hours ago

The register would never be sarcastic

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Tbh I think the billionaires are betting that if AI happens they'll be able to be immortal because the AI will be able to transfer their brains into Cymeks