this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2026
426 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

82798 readers
3191 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Allow me to spread the word about ListenBrainz , the occasion being that ListenBrainz is about to hit 100.000 users.

2HiSkLmicumPMOg.png

ListenBrainz is a FOSS project that aims to crowdsource listening data and release it under an open license. Basically it’s Last.fm but better. Whatever you use to listen to music, you can probably link it up with ListenBrainz. For instance you can connect Spotify, Apple Music, Soundcloud, Last.fm . You can link it up with loads of music players . If you’ve kept track of your what music you’ve listened to up to this point, don’t worry, there are several ways to import them into ListenBrainz.

All ListenBrainz listening data is available for all to use. This means that we don't need to rely on big companies like Spotify for recommendation algorithms. We can use whatever algorithm suits us best. All sorts of other services could be build to make use of the ListenBrainz data set. The dataset can also help analyze other services' algorithms, for instance the Fair MusE project uses LB-data and LB-users to investigate the fairness of different music service algorithms.

Obviously ListenBrainz initially suffered from being a comparatively small service, For good recommendations you need loads of data. But it's growing every day and I feel like the 1 billion listens is an impressive milestone. And ListenBrainz has the advantage of having listening data from several services, Spotify could never recommend you music that's not on Spotify. ListenBrainz, because it's open, doesn't have such inherent blindspots.

I am not working for ListenBrainz in any way, I just really like this project as well as MusicBrainz , and I like to spread the word. I think the aims of the ListenBrainz probably align with some Fediverse-folks. If you don't care about the service itself, you could still link up to support FOSS music services, not only LB itself, but other services that are, can and will be built using LB's data. If you use another service to store your own listening data, for instance Last.fm, you could use ListenBrainz as a backup for you data in case the other sevice ever enshittifies. Note: you shouldn't sign up if you want your listening data to be private, that's not what LB is for. I care very much about privacy, but in the case of LB I consciously choose to share my music listening data with others for my own benefit.

Curious to hear peoples thought on all this.

P.S. I have posted about LB over a year ago. I don't intend to spam this service, but i feel like it could be useful for folks on here, and I think most of you folks would support the spreading of FOSS. And LBs usercount rising from 36k january last year to 100k now seemed like a good celebratory occasion to spread the love once more.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 1 points 47 minutes ago (1 children)

I wonder what caused the sharp user increase from April and after

[–] Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social 1 points 1 minute ago

Yes me too. I have no idea.

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Whatever you use to listen to music

Winamp gang! (sadly not supported)

But I don't want my listening history publicly accessible (I was an avid Last.fm user in the '10s, but always kept my profile private), so I would skip this one anyway. Love MusicBrainz though.

[–] Kissaki@feddit.org 3 points 2 hours ago

How do they handle fake data submissions? Ignore and let consumers figure that out?

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Looks interesting, any suggestions about how to get started? Is there a mobile app I can use to play songs?

[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

Been an LB user for more than 2 years now, and it's been my nerd snipping since then. The metadata is a joy to work with, and it's quite easy to script things.

It does have that "brand new app" smell to it, but that means you get to experience seeing a long awaited feature finally getting done.

[–] Zarajevo@feddit.org 5 points 11 hours ago

Thanks for the tip, will check it out. The only things that bugs me it that there source code is only on Microsoft Github service, just self-host forgejo like sane FOSS projects do

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

I already use MusicBrainz Picard to scan and sort my music files.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

So what happens to the data? As far as I can see you're uploading your music listens to the service and you don't have a private profile, it's always public and everything is being provided as a download for everybody. So everybody can get the full amount of my listening history, including Metadata telling them for example when I was awake, listened to sad songs or drinking songs on a thursday night?

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I felt a bit weird about it at first, but the one thing keeping me tied to Spotify was how useful it was for discovering new music (though even that had been degrading by the time I cancelled it).

If you're someone who either prefers to listen to music that they already know and love, or someone who enjoys discovering new music through manual effort, then Listenbrainz isn't for you

However, if you're currently relying on the recommendations of a service like Spotify, then it's at least worth considering. For me, I became a lot more at ease with Listenbrainz when I realised that this kind of music recommendation simply isn't possible without other people's data — and that part of the "price" for being able to access recommendations built from that data is that my listening history gets added to the pool of listening data used by the recommendation system.

If it's Spotify's pool that I'm contributing to, then I feel like I'm getting a pretty bad deal, because they hoard that data like a digital dragon, and then use it to further entrench their monopolistic position in the market. I don't like that — it makes me feel complicit in the grossness.

Whereas with Listenbrainz, I'm contributing to a data commons of sorts. Listenbrainz's recommendation algorithm has gotten so much better in the couple of years that I've been using it, and that wouldn't be possible without a growing pool of data. Independent researchers and developers are able to benefit from it, and the more people we have making stuff in this space, the more we chip away at Spotify's power.

Like I said, having my data be so public does make me feel a tad uneasy, but with data like this, it tends to only be valuable in bulk (meaning the system doesn't care about any individual's sad drinking songs), or hypothetically, to individuals who are excessively concerned with another individual (such as stalkers, I guess). However, that last point doesn't concern me, because I made my Listenbrainz account under a username that's unconnected to any of my others, and my profile shows no indication of who I am on Spotify.

I'm sure that someone dedicated and skilled enough could retrieve my Spotify account name from the system, because I linked my account way back when I did have Spotify, but I trust Listenbrainz with my data a hell of a lot more than I do Spotify. Spotify definitely have way more money to hire cybersecurity folk to prevent exfiltration of user data, but they're so opaque that even if there were a breach, I wouldn't trust them to tell me. I've been following Listenbrainz's development for a while, and they're pretty cautious and transparent with how they go about things.

To be clear, I'm not formally affiliated with Listenbrainz in any way. I have contributed to improving documentation a few times (because that's usually the best way I can support open source projects, as a mediocre programmer), but that stems from the same thing that made me write this comment: I just really like what they're trying to do, and I think the world would be a little better if more people joined it. (also, I am just a huge nerd for metadata schema, and the affiliated musicbrainz project has so much cool stuff for me to learn about)

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think one issue is how this aggregate data is being provided for download. Is it really "this user has listened to this song on this day at this minute", or is it kind of an aggregate data like "users who listen to Metallica also listen to Pantera" and "the most listened song for Taylor Swift is shake it off"?

[–] Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social 1 points 9 minutes ago

Yes I think it is like you describe.

Here is someone from MetaBrainz explaining why.

[–] Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social 16 points 1 day ago

Yes, there is not a feature for private profiles. If your listening data is a privacy concern to you it's better not to use LB.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Whatever floats your boat, but I think algorithmic music recommendations are utterly useless. If I want to broaden my musical horizon, I absolutely want chance to be an element in that. Be it radio music, film music, some kind of background music in a restaurant or while shopping - whatever. I don't need a stinking algorithm for everything :p

[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

What has worked nice for me is to listen to the AccuRadio channel of the genre I'm in the mood for, and rate the songs. Then later when I have the time, I look at my ratings history page and download the ones I rated high from youtube in mp3, so I can have my own local "radio stations" of the songs I enjoy. Then months later, when/if I got bored of them, I can go back to AccuRadio and see what new songs they added in the meantime.

[–] Vinny_93@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago (7 children)

This is pretty much the step I need to get back to listening to my own music rather than streaming. Can it plugin to 'offline' apps?

[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

Depends. LB supports traditional Lastfm scrobling, so you can use players that scrobbles to Lastfm if you can change the URL

The in-app player is more limited, but a good old Navidrome instance is plenty enough!

[–] e8CArkcAuLE@piefed.social 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

apparently it has navidrome support :) navidrome enables you to have your own music library on a device from that you then stream it on your other devices

[–] Tamps@feddit.uk 9 points 1 day ago

Can confirm this works with Navidrome. I also have Navidrome updating last.fm as well.

[–] tordenflesk@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

The other way around, and yes.

https://kawaiidango.github.io/pano-scrobbler/ is one example, but most decent Desktop/Mobile applications have some sort of plugin.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mrcleanup@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Can someone explain to a Gen x guy what "listening data" gets me? I've been living off a folder of mp3s for 30 years. Does this use my music? Does this get it from the Internet somewhere? How is it different from asking Alexa to play music for me? Thanks.

[–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

It depends on your preferences, but myself I just like knowing what I listen to a lot and send my monthly cover art collage to brag about my blorbos

1000033874

The player / radio are nice, but I personally created my own radio generator based on my data

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I’ve been living off a folder of mp3s for 30 years.

Same here. I love that shit. My mood is the algorithm. I still occasionally get new stuff, but from other sources I happen to see or hear, like a Netflix show that has it in the background or a musician's personal recommendation in an interview, and I go look it up manually. But even if I never got anything new, I already have more music than I could easily listen to in a lifetime that I already know I liked at least once.

I've tried streaming sources, but it never hits right. This way, where I am specifically picking the artist or album, it's always right, always fresh, and I'm always listening to something I want to hear.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 3 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

where I am specifically picking the artist or album, it’s always right

That's a remarkable level of effort, these days. Yes, I know, it's trivial compared to pulling vinyl from the sleeve and flipping it every 20 minutes the way I used to before 1985, but... I prefer to put in my music effort with focus, and let a mix algorithm surprise me when I'm not in "music picking mode." To me, it's much more enjoyable to hear a song I like that I wasn't expecting than it is to think about it, navigate the list of thousands to find my pick, and then hear the thing I was thinking of.

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I have yet to find an algorithm that has figured out what I like about music. So I curate my own collection. Only way it works for me.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 5 hours ago

What works for me is to have a pool of thousands of "songs I like" - but then you've got the mood problem: Metallica or Sarah McLaughlin? That's what AcousticBrainz was good at: picking through my collection for similar songs and playing that "mood" from the pool of songs I've already indicated I like by including them in the available list to choose from.

Where it excelled was at finding the outliers, like the relatively quiet Metallica song that fits with the current set.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's all good. I think it has a lot more to do with accommodating one's own brain, and how we individually categorize and enjoy our listening, than with specifics of music like genre/artist/album/track.

For myself, I almost always have some tune or another out of nowhere running through my head, so when I choose something to listen to, I am either picking with or against what's already playing. So if I tune in to the music that's already playing, I can see associated choices that are the same, similar, or completely unrelated on a superficial level, but my brain has linked them all somehow. Any of those choices, if I put them on, will satisfy because my brain is already playing one and mentally I'm already there.

I think the reasons algorithms never work for me is because no one could ever follow that, much less predict it. Even I can't. Instead I've learned to simply accommodate it.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 5 hours ago

so when I choose something to listen to, I am either picking with or against what’s already playing.

AcousticBrainz has (had?) a bunch of dimensional measures of various qualities of a song. How I used it was to first define a set of maybe 4 to 8 songs to "set the mood" and then pick a list of a few hundred songs that were "closest to" those songs in all the AB dimensional measures, pre-filtering out artists and songs recently played. Then - the final step was to sort the remaining candidates by their similarity to the songs most recently played. It was still random within that list, but a weighted random with the most similar (by AB measurements) songs most likely to be queued up next.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've been using LastFM for nearly two decades now. First of all, having personal listening statistics is kind of fun. It might be not for everybody, but it's nice to see which albums are your most played over a year or what you listened to back in 2015, how your favorite artists changed, which album really vibed with you and so on.

Second, you can get really good recommendations for new music when you have a larger user base and are running into a smaller genres. So just like Amazon's and people who bought this product also bought that product for music. So people who listen to Britney Spiels also like to listen to Christina Aguilera. That might be obvious for you, but it's totally interesting if you go down some of these genres and if you want to explore them.

And on a broader scale, listening data is quite valuable to create a good music service. So if somebody never heard of a band called Deep Purple and wants to change that, there might be this one song everybody knows from Deep Purple. And this is, of course, the most popular, but how do you find out that this is the most popular? So if you have your own Jellyfin installation, you load in several albums of Deep Purple, but you need some data source to tell you that 'smoke on the water' is that famous song from Deep Purple that everybody's listening to.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 1 points 19 hours ago

I love listening stats, I just don't need to share them, and for that I have Navidrome. I use subsonic clients and a Navidrome server for my Bandcamp purchased. I get the stats and privacy too..

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] paris@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

I use Koito as a selfhosted version of this. I use the ListenBrainz plugin to send my Jellyfin listening data to Koito, which has a setting to forward that data to ListenBrainz so I can have a backup and contribute to the ListenBrainz project. It's pretty cool!

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago

Such a great service.
Both it and musicbrainz.

I have been using Last.fm for almost 20 years. Still using it because I already know it well and it works.

I hadn't done my homework yet on ListenBrainz, despite using Picard for a couple years now.

Welp, your words convinced me that I should make the switch. Thank you for your post!

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hear hear! I love me the brainz projects. Their player is a bit buggy still but so so good to avoid being locked in

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xpey@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Used Last.fm for like 3 months before finding out about ListenBrainz and making the switch. Truly amazing app, love all of their services (Picard my goat) and I'm happy to hear more people are joining!

I wish the social aspect was a bit more active though, I always follow people with similar taste but I never get a follow back (and the accounts always have 0 people they follow). Also I never see pinned songs and such :(

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 2 points 11 hours ago

Yeah, it's pretty low on the social side of things. However, having watched the massive progress the project has made over the last few years makes me hopeful that it'll continue to improve. They seem to be quite smart about how they go about developing new features, which is wise for an open source project. It's been pretty cool to watch how good their recommendation algorithm has been getting though, compared to when I first joined

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›