this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
186 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

83406 readers
4206 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...because VPNs obscure a user’s true location, and because intelligence agencies presume that communications of unknown origin are foreign, Americans may be inadvertently waiving the privacy protections they’re entitled to under the law...

...VPNs might protect you against garden-variety criminals, but the intentional commingling of origin/destination points by VPNs could turn purely domestic communications into “foreign” communications the NSA can legally intercept (and the FBI, somewhat less-legally can dip into at will)...

Certainly the NSA isn’t concerned about “incidental collection.” It’s never been too concerned about its consistent “incidental” collection of US persons’ communications and data in the past and this isn’t going to budge the needle, especially since it means the NSA would have to do more work to filter out domestic communications and the FBI would be less than thrilled with any efforts made to deny it access to communications it doesn’t have the legal right to obtain on its own.

Since the government won’t do this, it’s up to the general public, starting with everyone sharing the contents of this letter with others. VPNs can still offer considerable security benefits. But everyone needs to know that domestic surveillance is one of the possible side effects of utilizing this tech.

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 20 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Oh nooo, we won't be protected by the law they can't be arsed to follow anyway? Whatever will I do when they surveil my encrypted VPN traffic?

[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 2 points 37 minutes ago* (last edited 36 minutes ago)

Store now, decrypt later. Make sure your VPN is using quantum-safe encryption algorithms with perfect forward secrecy. They are storing ALL traffic that goes outside the country (probably domestic traffic too, realistically).

[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 5 points 1 hour ago

what in the anti-VPN fearmongering is this bullshit?

[–] Tharkys@lemmy.wtf 15 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

So, I am a remote worker in Healthcare. Obviously, I need to use a VPN to connect to work to ensure that communication is secure. But because I have a job that requires secure access, I am a suspected domestic terrorist?

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 10 points 2 hours ago

No, because there are different types of vpn connectivity.

A point to point vpn is what employees use to connect to the office. The intention is to encrypt the connection so a 3rd party can’t access ithe data going through it. The FBI/NSA won’t care about this type of vpn because your work knows who you are and logs all traffic generated by you which could be subpoenaed by the government.

Connecting to a vpn server in another country to then access the internet hides your original ip address, gets around geo-location blocks and the traffic is typically not logged by the vpn provider. This is the type of vpn governments don’t like.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 hours ago
[–] No1@aussie.zone 10 points 2 hours ago

I don't get it.

Why should a Russian spy have to tell Americans anything?

[–] schwim@piefed.zip 13 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

They have been surveiling us for years. They just to maximize what they can collect.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 2 points 27 minutes ago

Correct, and the FBI inadvertently admitted it publicly by releasing video in the Guthrie abduction case that shouldn't exist.

Every device with a wireless connection and a GPS, camera, or microphone is surveilling you.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They've already collected your modal verb!

[–] schwim@piefed.zip 1 points 38 minutes ago (1 children)

I've been pegged as one who serially modals online.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 1 points 21 minutes ago

I connected to my VPN so I can see a video of that and now I'm on 7 government watchlists

[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 39 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Time to spread the free word of Tor to everyone.

[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

Doesn’t that have the same problem?

[–] aeiou@piefed.social 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Zen_Shinobi@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

I wasn't crazy about i2p. I really loved Freenet and Zeronet

[–] PityPityBangBang@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I'd say a large part of my day is looking for interesting links for the officers and agents in Bothell, WA that have my IP locale originate, so that they can have stuff to their show their spouses/prostitute that they are extorting/your mom after their shift.

[–] rossman@lemmy.zip 10 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

Is it safe enough to use vpns based out of the US? I'm using nord which is non us.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 10 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Those are the ones that would cause them to surveil you.

The issue isn't necessarily "the government will target you for using a VPN;" the issue is "if your IP makes you look like you're outside the US because that's where your traffic exits the VPN, the laws against domestic spying won't protect you properly because you'll look like a foreigner."

Frankly, the headline is heavily spinning it to be anti-VPN fearmongering.

[–] rossman@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 hours ago

Yeah I reacted way too quickly. Then I realized half of X bot traffic spoofs everywhere. They're intentionally doing a shakeup of everything and this one got under my skin cause I'm a daily user.

But before this was that outside US router ban that was pretty real. The DJI ban. So these types of news cascade and its worrisome.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 42 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

Nord is owned by Tesonet, a data mining company which also owns SurfShark.

And Private Internet Access and ExpressVPN are owned by Kape, an Israeli firm.

ProtonVPN is owned by Proton, in Switzerland.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 33 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Mullvad is based in Sweden and is the main interest of its seemingly decent, also Swedish, parent company

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Fan of Mullvad but just be aware its not what you want if you're using a VPN for torrenting. They had to remove their port forwarding feature due to some bad actors ruining it for the rest of us.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If a friend was interested in that, what should I tell them to use instead? Asking for a friend, obviously.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I switched to AirVPN when Mullvad made the change. I think Proton, PIA, and Windscribe have it too.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

Thanks. Sounds good

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 6 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

What happens if you are torrenting via Mullvad?

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 hours ago

they don't allow port forwarding which nerfs the effectiveness of seeding, seeding is still possible, just not as effective.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 hours ago

You'll only be able to connect to certain peers that do have port forwarding setup.

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 5 points 4 hours ago

CyberGhost I believe is also owned by Kape or a subsidiary.

[–] rossman@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 hours ago

Thanks for the extra digging, no true privacy but at least there's some transparency with the vpns.

[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Is it safe enough to use vpns based out of the US?

yes, just be aware that the gov could require the company to log you without letting you know, even if they have a no log setup. For the everyday person this is a non-issue, but if you are doing shadey stuff or have ties that may make someone super interested in your activities, you may wanna choose elsewhere.

[–] rossman@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 hours ago

The everyday person has political views that can be categorized as extremist. Freedom is more costly.

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

No. They will see that you’re using a vpn.

They might decide to record your traffic and save it until it can be decrypted.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

In theory, I think all VPN usage is grounds to get you put on a list, but Nord is considered a relatively "normie" company by privacy aficionados. Everybody and their mother has seen an ad for it by this point. (The privacy aficionados will probably tell you it's not good enough, but that's a can of worms I won't get into right now.)

[–] rossman@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Makes sense I should probably reframe it as is nord not going to sell their users out without a fight.

Only true privacy is like the tails stuff and some complicated routing stuff all the self hosting guys here probably know about.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 13 points 5 hours ago

AFAIK the one company that has been battle-tested is Mullvad, everything else requires (more) crossing your fingers.

Nord has subpar standards when it comes to logging now, and if that's in line with recent Proton behavior, you might that interpret that as a potential willingness to cave to the US with minimal pushback

[–] lemmyng@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Those Senators can gargle some uncooked nuts.

[–] klugerama@lemmy.world 23 points 5 hours ago

Giving you the benefit of the doubt, I think you misunderstood who is at fault here.

The senators aren't asking the government to spy on Americans. They're only asking the DNI to make it clear to the public that the US government already might be spying on them.