this post was submitted on 03 Apr 2026
10 points (100.0% liked)

Games

24508 readers
44 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works
10
What do you think is a good Achievement system logic? (thelemmy.club)
submitted 4 hours ago by Ananananas@thelemmy.club to c/games@sh.itjust.works
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Inspired by https://lemmy.world/post/45118004

What do you think is a good sweet spot for Achievements?

I think it's nice to have a few easy one (even if it's just to let the person know that the game HAS achievements), and some that just make progression sense (like, an achievement for completing a stage or a quest or a story etc.)

And I think it's nice to have some challenging ones. Especially ones that create certain limits like "use on X weapon" or "only have X resource" etc. But I don't love Achievements that are tied to purchases (like an Achievement for buying the game in Early Access or so). Also not a super fan of speed run achievements but to be fair, that's purely because I just hate the whole speed running thing.

Also don't like it when games that are very long have multiple ending-related achievements as they just smack of trying to artificially increase replayability. In similar vein, don't like achievements that you can fail at the last second.

I suppose I like achievements that reward dedicated playing over raw skill (call me casual then).

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] themoken@startrek.website 4 points 2 hours ago

I really don't have any problem with any of these types of achievements in general. Even the super basic ones that you get by starting a game are useful to determine what percentage of people who own the game have actually played it beyond the menu screen.

The best achievements are ones you get for being clever, skilled, or dedicated. Or when it's an unhidden achievement for something you didn't even know was possible. Like the BG3 achievement for saving the goblin Sazza - just seeing it was possible made my next play through more interesting.

I do appreciate long ending achievements, but only if they indicate a significantly different playthrough. Good ending vs. bad ending works when that's the result of many decisions and not just an option you chose ten minutes from the end.

[–] Broadfern@lemmy.world 4 points 3 hours ago

Major story point achievements + Easter egg achievements is my favorite, personally. If it involves replaying a level (vs. the whole game) in a certain way just for fun that’s also enjoyable.

Achievements that require DLC purchases (looking at you, Powerwash simulator) or ungodly difficult full-run-with-a-certain-streak types get on my nerves but fortunately achievements are purely optional 😄