this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2026
143 points (99.3% liked)

Not The Onion

21236 readers
1788 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Still, Parnell wrote, “Anyone saying the Secretary misquoted Ezekiel 25:17 is peddling fake news and ignorant of reality.”

It's going to be extremely hard to fact check information from the MOST POPULAR FUCKING BOOK OF ALL TIME

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Grok, copy this homework but change it a little so the teacher doesn't know

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 14 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Newsweek noted that the Bible passage was a condemnation of Philistines and the Cherethites, historic enemies of the Israelites, dating to the fifth century BC. Ezekiel, the Old Testament book in which it appears, focuses on a demonstrative prophet of the same name who engages in street theater to attract the attention of crowds to deliver his message.

Er, it wasn’t a condemnation of the people groups; it was a condemnation of those who practiced child sacrifice, took bribes, and exploited orphans and widows. It just happened to tie this to the governments of the Philistines and Cherethites, who were known for doing these things.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

This sounds like all things Trump has done.

And I fully believe the allegations in the Epstein files and that Trump was co conspirator to all of it, which is why I say the child sacrifice part sounds like Trump.

The man claimed he witnessed "ritualistic sacrifice" and "babies being dismembered" on a yacht belonging to Epstein in 2000

[–] ef9357@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago

The entire mar-a-lago mafia is incompetent. If they could be combined into one person, you still wouldn’t be able to find a competent person. Probably because Trump it’s an idiot that has to be the smartest person in the room.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If I understand correctly, the classic dictator approach is to appoint relatively competent underlings in positions of power, as long as they aren't real threats, with most of their aggression spent punching down or squabbling amongst themselves.

By contrast, the idea here seems to be in appointing bumbling nitwits at said positions, such that after they make fools of themselves, they can then be blamed for this or that and ejected like a used diaper.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

He wanted nothing but yes-men this time around, so "bumbling nitwit" was basically a prerequisite. The competent evil people are pulling their strings behind the scenes.