An untested backup is not a backup, it's a wish.
this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2026
119 points (98.4% liked)
Selfhosted
58921 readers
1431 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
-
No spam posting.
-
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
-
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
-
No trolling.
-
No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Also known as Schrödinger's Backup.
Schrödinger did not have a backup cat.
Well, he did and he didn't...
Restored my backup and have all and none of the files, sir. Don't look at it until we fsck.
But he had quantum entanglement
How do you guys test your backups?
I have restored my proxmox setup from backup and it worked, but that is not something I do on regular basis.
I have from time to time done spot checks that certain files are working.
Most of the time I rely on the verification done by proxmox backup server..
How do you guys test your backups?
The image backups I do of my server are tested in a VM
PBS verification is only a checksum of file integrity. If somehow the backup was zero-length, or was otherwise corrupt, the verification would succeed but the backup would be useless. How often you do file or full restores is up to you, but required for actual verification.
That's a gimmie. I test server image backups in a VM. So far, I've never had to resort of a backup, but I don't want to find out that my image is worthless if I ever had the need.
Narrator: The fire detector in fact did not work.
There's more than one kind of backup in life, check them all.
That’s one I’d have the facility owner hire someone to test.
Two backups is one and one is none.
Two untested backups are worse than one tested backup though.
3, 2, 1.... Test the backup!
... Is that the rule, right?
From now on!
this drove me nuts at workplaces. we have to test the backups after backup. so many did not want to waste the resources. if it worked fine once it will always work fine to them.
Sounds like there's room for a tool that checks backups
or ai that evaluates. For me the backup works if the whole system actually works. Its more commonly known as disaster recovery.
I run Borg backup, and I did a successful live test yesterday. Deleted the wrong file and hade to restore it.
Somebody tell that to tindie.com !
Who's that?
It's a DIY electronics marketplace, went offline for "routine maintenance" as has been offline for 4 days and counting ...
rule of thumb. any backup you don't regularly test isn't a backup.