this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
122 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

83990 readers
4933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 59 minutes ago

There has been a computer revolution for sure

There has been a mobile phone revolution, absolutely

There was even a social media revolution, changed the way we interact

AI, though, so far has been just "the next it fad" in the 2-5 year cycle, like NFT before it, like Crypto currencies before that, and what was it before that? Web 3.0, then before that there was... Trying to remember.. cloud computing? Each of these fads had minor to no influence.in how we did things, and for AI we only just added in stupidity of writing documents with AI which completely misses the point why we write those documents to begin with

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 22 points 5 hours ago

So far, there hasn't been an AI revolution, any more than there was a Segway or an NFT revolution.

[–] ignirtoq@feddit.online 94 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

For enthusiasts, AI promises to usher in something that socialists have long dreamed of: a world without scarcity in which human beings can move finally from the realm of necessity to the realm of freedom.

Like many problems techbros try to solve, this is a problem of politics and social organization, not technology. We have had the technology to free the entire human population from several fundamental scarcities for decades (food and housing most prominently, but also many diseases), but the groups with the resources to do so actively choose not to solve those problems. Mostly because they are antisocial psychopathic billionaires.

[–] Rekall_Incorporated@piefed.social 12 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

It's like global malnutrition/hunger, it's not that we don't have enough food (I believe total global calorie per capita per day output might be significantly above the recommended 2,500 or so calories); it's the distribution where the problem lies.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 1 points 5 minutes ago

Except we still can't solve this in the US, where that distribution is orders of magnitude easier

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Which to OPs point is a socio-political problem. We have the technology and means to distribute it globally, or ensure it’s created closer to the need, it’s just not being done.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 23 points 8 hours ago

In reality things are becoming more scarce because of AI and I‘m afraid we‘ve only scratched the surface. And all that when we barely have any actual use cases for it.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 16 points 8 hours ago

But they promised me that the Regurgitation Engine would solve all problems!

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 27 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm not sure there's any more depressing climax I could imagine to this story:

While the talk of eradicating friction or even rents suggests a “freeing up” of capital for more productive investment, given services would follow manufacturing into a realm of hyperproductive overcapacity, there would seem to be no upside to the euthanasia of the rentier in this instance.

Rather than “free up” business, this development would destroy it. Capital may well be a parasite, but in the absence of revolutionary pressure it is still work-producing. Our jobs might be bullsh-t, but without them there is only unemployment and (even more) poverty.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 24 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

For most people it is easier to imagine the end of the world than it is to imagine the end of capitalism.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 13 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

We live in capitalism. Its power seems inescapable; so did the divine right of kings. … Power can be resisted and changed by human beings; resistance and change often begin in art

  • Ursula K Le Guin

https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Ursula_K._Le_Guin

And art is being destroyed by AI

Those are very different things though.

And one can argue that how people imagine the end of the world is probably shaped works of art/media.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Yea … it’s the but I don’t get why people don’t care about this more.

If we’re replaced, there’s nothing really left for us in the terms of the way we’ve conceived our whole world for centuries. Sure maybe we go native again or something, but let’s be real, that is a massively tough transition even if it’s viable.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 8 hours ago

AI revolution, not likely. more like AI age of degeneracy.