this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
96 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

84302 readers
6076 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 hours ago

... these updated regulations further demonstrate the state’s commitment to public safety

No it doesn't. Taking these vehicles, which are clearly not production ready, off the streets would. So now you have these effective 360 degree cameras, systematically roaming public streets, that are legally required to collect and report data on "safety related" incidents (which could be anything these days).

[–] Karmanopoly@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Does Elon pay the tickets?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 17 points 7 hours ago

If they would ticket the cars for driving without a licensed driver, I'd be OK with it.

[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 27 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

They couldn't before?

You also need to have a Finnish style progressive fines relative to income, which would also extend to companies.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

If fines scaled with wealth that might create an incentive for the police to harass rich people instead of poor people. It won't, because the police serve the wealthy, but it's a nice day fantasy.

[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

We have this in Finland, some rich people have been fined over 200k for speeding. No particular targeting of rich people noted.

[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago

In the US, a portion of that fine goes back to the police departments. Giving them a financial incentive to give tickets.

If the fines went to anything except the people giving the fines, then it could work here. But we were so stupid to couple the two in the first place.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 10 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Technically? No. The problem is that the existing laws legally speaking all apply to the driver, and tickets likewise are all issued to the driver, which doesn't actually exist in this case. Cops were writing tickets and the company was paying them, but legally speaking it was a grey area and waymo could have disputed the tickets and there's a decent chance they would have won. This legislation removes the ambiguity.

[–] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Ah, corporations are people when donating for political causes and when ecxercising free speech, but not when driving a vehicle?

[–] JustAnotherKay@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

To put it more generally, corporations are people when it’s good to be a person, but not when it’s bad to be a person

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

Driverless cars are just full of ambiguities. Who’s liable when it kills someone; does anyone go to jail; do they have their license revoked? Do they get points on their license for all these tickets; cumulatively, or per car? If their license gets revoked (do they even have a license?) do you suspend the whole fleet, or just that “version” of the driver software?

These things do not belong on the road.