this post was submitted on 06 May 2026
56 points (98.3% liked)

Linux

65081 readers
155 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

Kinda weird there's some insistence about open source only getting funding from the purest of sources.

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 22 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

I simply cannot see any good coming from Foundations receiving funds from objectively bad Corporations. Hope I'm wrong.

[–] Yttra@lemmy.world 1 points 26 minutes ago

If they have a significant amount of money to donate to a foundation the odds are they're evil anyway.

Foundations can just not get enough money and collapse, if you want.

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

Could be worse, and it's free money.

[–] AnyOldName3@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Sometimes, evil corporations want to use a FLOSS tool for exactly the same things as its other users do, so if they give money to the developers to use to do what the users want, everyone benefits. Other times, evil corporations want to buy some of the good reputation of a FLOSS tool and/or infect it with their toxic reputation as a marketing strategy, and only evil benefits.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Wait, the implication here is that there are good corporations?

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

there's nothing more important than being right on the internet. lol

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 5 points 4 hours ago

I'm more on the side of "never stop an adversary from making a mistake".

If they give their dirty money but have no control or power over you, take it and use it for your own agenda.

[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe anthropic wants the app better controllable by agents?

[–] hoshikarakitaridia@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Yeah I'm 100% sure they are doing this A) for good PR (blender is a beloved app and funding them is awesome) b) to retain communication with the team for easier agent integration later c) to lobby for their AI.

I can totally understand that it doesn't look great if blender accepts the money.

I am sure though that blender could probably need the money; open source software is criminally underfunded and those devs need money to survive at the end of the day.

[–] solrize@lemmy.ml 14 points 11 hours ago

I am alterIng the deal. Pray I don't alter it any further.

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Who fucking wanted this and do we have a replacement?

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Did you read the article? Blender isn't doing AI stuff.

[–] nixfreak@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 hours ago

lol, I was confused with the comments also.