this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
55 points (84.8% liked)

Linux

65106 readers
851 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

According to the latest annual report from the Linux Foundation (LF), less than 3% of its budgetary resources are allocated to the thing it is named after!

top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] psycotica0@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 hour ago

It's nice of this poster to ignore the $181m spent on "other projects" and conclude this is some kind of scam. If we include the Linux Kernel with the other projects part, that's about 67%, or two thirds, of their expenses are paying for various and assorted open source projects. Among them the kernel. So if you're a "cash and cash alone" person, then 2/3rds of your money is still going as cash to software projects.

And if we include things like community tooling and project services, which may help a project in ways beyond just cash that becomes about 78% in total, or over three quarters.

That's pretty good, I think, but to each their own.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 55 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Well yeah only 3% go to the kernel. Most of the rest seems to be going to everything else required for a functional OS. The kernel alone is fairly useless.

[–] artifex@piefed.social 21 points 3 hours ago (4 children)

So what you're saying is it's not Linux, it's somethingElse/Linux ?

[–] iByteABit@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 12 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

You see, that's just inaccurate. GNU/Linux is not equivalent to GNU+Linux. That would be addition; this is division. The bigger Linux gets, the smaller GNU/Linux becomes.

That's why they've developed GNU/Hurd. Hurd is unlikely to ever amount to much, meaning that GNU/Hurd will never evaluate to a small value. And that is cold, hard mathematical fact.

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

Hurd rescently became an option with Gentoo Linux (experimentally). Debian offers it too.

GNU/Hurd will rise as soon as the abusers of that penguin abomination will realise they have been tricked by big tech. The free future is Gnu/Hurd and 9Front.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

Its software packages required to build functional GNU/Linux operating systems. Yes.

Normal people just call all of this "linux" for simplicity, but annoying people keep feeling a need to point out the distinction.

[–] artifex@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

Right. And that somethingElse is probably not Unix

[–] ergonomic_importer@piefed.ca 7 points 3 hours ago

Or as I like to call it, somethingElse+Linux

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 12 minutes ago)

GNU stands for "GNU's not Unix", which itself means 'GNU's not Unix not Unix'. If two nots logically undo each other then you might say GNU is Unix but in programming you would likly apply one assignment at a time: expressed as GNU = ! Unix = Unix or simply GNU's not Unix.

[–] dragnucs@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Seems to be going to Corporate Operations, Event Services, Project Support. But little goes to Linux kernel, and project infrastructure.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, the money's "going to" two of the least funded categories in the chart. 🙄

[–] stoicEuropean@lemmy.ml 41 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Mhm, I think this is more complicated than it looks. The LF today isn't a direct Linux kernel funding body and more an umbrella for open-source governance (infrastructure, events, certification, security work, to name a few). So the other 97% are not necessarily wasted. Also, many kernel developers are paid outside of the LF by companies like Red Hat, Google, AMD, SUSE, Microsoft. So in reality there is alot more cash flowing towards Linux kernel development. A better/sharper criticism would be that the LF has become an industry consortium for "enterprise open source" or so, rather than a Linux-centered foundation. The counterpoint on the other Hand is that this founded infrastructure is exactly what allows large-scale open-source projects to function in the first place.

[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 3 points 28 minutes ago

There could well be a kernel of valid criticism in it but this article is so exaggerated and strident, that I can't take it seriously. It's like people who scream GOVERNMENT WASTE about every budget line item that is not obviously important to someone who has only the most simple and ignorant understanding of it.

[–] huf@hexbear.net 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

yeah, some of the budget goes to what looks like maintaining infrastructure that other projects use (i assume). but the 12% AI and 4% blockchain are pretty indefensible...

[–] dirakon@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago

I love crypto and open source tooling around it, what is supposed to be indefensible about it?

[–] SocialistVibes01@lemmy.ml 18 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Corpos doing what corpos do better.

12% to AI

Yikes

[–] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev 2 points 1 hour ago

Sincerely, what did you expect? I mean, obviously it's hyped right now, but let's be real - AI is not going to go away anymore.

[–] dragnucs@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The linux foundation does not care about linux. They don't even use it.

[–] 0xd34d@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I can tell you from personal experience this is not true, they use linux.

[–] dragnucs@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I cannot challenge your personal experience. But during some live talks, they were seen using macs with macos. and some documents produced using a macos related tooling in metadata.

[–] cockmushroom@reddthat.com 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Since when is knowing how to use one operating system proof that you don't use another?

[–] dragnucs@lemmy.ml 1 points 55 minutes ago

I did not say "know how to use", but "use". If you are advocating for a product, then you use it publicly ain't that right? Imagine Coca-cola crew publicly drinking Pepsi. Or mcdonalds directory not eating his own burgers.