this post was submitted on 13 May 2026
110 points (97.4% liked)

Technology

84569 readers
3632 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PierceTheBubble@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 hours ago

The EU’s executive arm has also developed its own age verification app, which has the “highest privacy standards in the world,” according to Von der Leyen. Member states will soon be able to integrate it into their digital wallets, and it can easily be enforced by online platforms. “No more excuses – the technology for age-verification is available,” the EU chief said.

So more pro age-verification propaganda, instead of what the headline suggests: nothing concrete in that regard. How about devices with parental control for kids, which only allow access to platforms suitable for the demographic, instead of "age"-gating the entire internet (including for adults)?

[–] Bigfishbest@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Fuck YouTube shorts too.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 28 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (2 children)

Please do (even though I personally don't use those apps). Including imposing more of the incredibly large fines the EU has become known for, and applying the bulk of them towards mental health services & initiatives. It's long past time those companies were held responsible for what they've done to rake in such insane profits.

[–] patruelis@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

They need to be % of the income to qualify as large. Anything less than a full % is peanuts.

Or subject them to audits to assess how much money was gained from the activity and make the fine 2x or more

[–] BangelaQuirkel@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] TRock@feddit.dk 11 points 9 hours ago

Well they are large, but not always compared the fine receivers profit