this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
45 points (78.5% liked)

Technology

84940 readers
3839 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

SpaceX conducted another successful Starship launch test yesterday evening.

You can watch the full, 1:40:00 footage here:

Invidious YouTube

I'd recommend watching it, it's a well-done video documentary, not too long, with good views.

top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] green_goglin@thelemmy.club 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

yeah it was outright visible that the documentary was especially well-done because a potential IPO

[–] pipe01@programming.dev 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

another successful starship launch

Lol, that would imply that they're has been any successful launch before

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

One vacuum engine went out on starship but the 3 sea level engines gimbaled to compensate and continue on to released all 22 starlink simulators, then land vertical in the ocean as if at the tower.

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It blew an engine and crashed into the sea.

That’s honestly not a big deal,

Fucking Jesus.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

These idiots are yelping and cheering in the background while rockets burn billions of taxpayer dollars.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also, they had to 'glide' in upper atmosphere for additional ~60s to hit the landing zone. I think they almost ran out of fuel due to engine failure

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah they also lost a sea level raptor on the booster towards the end of the accent. That's honestly not a big deal, losing 1/28 engines at a point in the flight when they're already probably throttling down a bunch.

But still, they've got some kinks to work out with the raptor 3.

That said, did you see how much faster it left the launch pad? They've seriously increased the thrust with these new raptors.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Scott Manley made video about this. Turns out with raptor 2 they were slow starting on purpose, while now they went full throttle immediately.

[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yep, it looks like that new much larger downcomer may really be the thing to thank, now they can actually feed all those engines fast enough.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

On the side note, it looked like their heat shield performed better than ever. Not only it shown low damage during splashdown, it also was exposed to heating in upper atmosphere for around minute more than normal due to course correction

[–] AshMan85@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Fuck anyone that supports that pedo

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 3 days ago (2 children)

i'm not a fan of musk at all; however this is in the technology community because it's a good technological breakthrough.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

And, it shouldn't need to be said, Elon Musk has exactly zero to do with this other than paying.

This is a conversation between engineers and physics.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Elon Musk is not paying, the US taxpayer is paying.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That doesn't change the point that the people who designed, built and operated the spacecraft in question here are the ones who own the accomplishment, regardless of ownership or funding.

[–] msage@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago

Paying? Like Musk is paying for anything lol.

Taxpayers have paid for this.

He is just a punchable face.

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Exactly zero except he's the owner and supporting spaceX directly contributes to his bank account.

No thanks

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Supporting SpaceX financially contributes to his bank account, posting on social media does nothing.

The engineers that did this are great, I don't care about Elon Musk... I'll choose a different space company to launch my satellites.

[–] emmy67@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That ignored my comment entirely. But even if you don't pay him through satellites, hyping this failure still contributes to his bank account.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago

I hope the world can survive the $0.38 worth of advertising that my comment adds to his trillion dollar bank account.