this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
386 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

85184 readers
3897 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 36 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

But everyone loves AI, look how its use has doubled! ᴬᶠᵗᵉʳ ʷᵉ ᶠᵒʳᶜᵉᵈ ⁱᵗ ⁱⁿᵗᵒ ᵉᵛᵉʳʸᵗʰⁱⁿᵍ ᵃⁿᵈ ᵐᵃᵈᵉ ⁱᵗ ᵒᵖᵗ ᵒᵘᵗ ᵒⁿˡʸ

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

and convinced half the ceos that forcing their employees to use it would improve Productivity^TM^

Little things like that could burst some bubbles

[–] Gonzako@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I love f95zones ai cg filter. More websites should implement it

[–] Zeh_oniam@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 22 hours ago

Alas, a lot of them are still don't have the tag in spite of the clear use of AI art. Mostly chinese jank, but still.

It is a good place tagging-wise tho.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 7 points 21 hours ago

They believe even if you don’t love it today, the next update to the model will change everything.

So measuring this would do nothing.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's a nice thought, but the people in charge have too much of their personal fortunes wrapped up in AI to offer us any real agency in whether or not we use it.

However, depending on the product, you can actively choose to use it less. I made a video on my YT channel a few months ago about steps you can take in order to (over time) train the YouTube algorithm to offer you less AI slop, but yeah, there's no magic bullet unless you actively seek out and use FOSS applications.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Getting off youtube is the sure way to stop all that noise. Plus you’re helping double by stopping the flow of capital to fascists

Delete your Google Everything

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Unfortunately the current state of the digital ecosystem means that there is no YT alternative, so many have no choice.

But people can still use the product in a more conscientious way.

[–] Jiral@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I subscribed to nebula.tv, at 3 EUR per month its reasonably priced but I don't know I use it way less than I anticipated. But it is still my way out. Many of the content creators I like are there too and non of the slop is but it is not a full replacement, the content is much more limited and no comments either.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I tried PeerTube a little, but had a similar experience. Even on the larger instances, it's just not a reasonable alternative at all.

[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

No, they can’t. Every advertiser dollar is being funneled into Google, the known fascist company.

Stop feeding the beast, you 100% have a choice to stop watching braindead fascism

[–] lemmysmash@piefed.social 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Ha, peasant! They're not here to give you options, they're here to make you watch more of the stupid garbage and click on more ads.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 1 points 21 hours ago

It's not like the non-ai content is ad free on YouTube...

[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 2 points 21 hours ago

You only need the label for a browser extension to work

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Detecting AI content will always be hard. To do it at scale, you'd need to use AI, there's basically no alternative, especially for search engines. Thr issue is AI models are constantly training to avoid detection, so we will always be in a state where AI cannot reliably detect AI output.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Ai images and movies can be invisible watermaked in image, sound or just metadata. Gemini is already doing that. It would not be hard to look for those signals during upload. YouTube is already doing something similar when it checks your videos for copyrighted music, content from other creators or advertiser unfriendly no-no words.

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Stripping metadata is not hard. If that gets you into the human section of the web, it's absolutely worth doing.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

99% percent of users won't know what it is, or how to remove it.

[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

The users arent the ones that need managed. Its the creators. And they will absolutely know how to remove marking metadata. Thats why its valled an Arms "Race". Its a constant need that is ever adapting.