this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
101 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

85274 readers
4389 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 8 points 5 hours ago

The chemical sensors on my smart watching begging me to stop dipping my hand into the unknown chemical bucket at work.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@kbin.earth 10 points 7 hours ago

One step closer to having tricorders hopefully, probably bullshit though.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 29 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

All jokes aside, this is super exciting if you are interested in instrumentation for environmental monitoring.

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago

All I’m hearing is “tricorder on the way”

[–] DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Unlike conventional spectrometers, which rely on dispersing light or algorithmic reconstruction to recover spectra, the convolutional spectrometer physically performs a convolution operation on the incoming light. This is achieved using a simple cascade of optical components with periodic spectral responses, such as unbalanced Mach–Zehnder interferometers or micro-ring resonators.

Is this thing a spectrometer or a fucking turbo encabulator?

[–] davad@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

I've worked with spectrometers and on spectrometry design before, and that quote from the article is intelligible. It's also pretentious and poorly explained.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 minutes ago

So, not bullshit?

[–] fonix232@fedia.io 1 points 23 minutes ago

I've never worked with spectrometers but physics and chemistry were some of my strongest subjects, so it made some sense to me - but the sentence was definitely written with the intent to say "look peons, I know big science words you do not, and I can string them into a sentence you'll question the legibility of".

[–] davad@lemmy.world 12 points 11 hours ago

The writing in the linked article is a little weird, as others have pointed out. However the journal publication is very cool. If this is reproducible, it'll likely have a noticeable impact over the next 10 years or so. We won't see $10 spectrometers, but we might see handheld ones in a similar format to the cheap IR cameras.

Here's the link for anyone interested.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41566-026-01891-6

[–] icerunner_origin@startrek.website 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

such as unbalanced Mach–Zehnder interferometers or micro-ring resonators

It has a base-plate of prefamulated amulite surmounted by a malleable logarithmic casing, aligned in such a way that the 2 main spurving bearings are in-line with the pentameter fan.

[–] DrakeAlbrecht@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago

The spectrometer knows where it is, because it knows where it isn't.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] fonix232@fedia.io 2 points 26 minutes ago

Why am I not surprised that it's an Israeli company?