this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
53 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

21694 readers
784 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.uk/post/50517085

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] workerONE@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago
[–] manxu@piefed.social 7 points 2 hours ago

I went and dug up Italian articles. The backstory is that there was a devastating fire due to human causes, so they came up with the umbrella ban to make access unpalatable and limit human occupation.

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 27 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Skin cancer right now in Sardinia.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Can you have a pop up tent?

[–] manxu@piefed.social 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

No, it's specifically forbidden, along with portable gazebos.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

No mention of yurts?

Sweet!

[–] justlemmyin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

What about a shack? Is that allowed?

[–] joeljoelle@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 5 hours ago

Sure and next year they start renting them out.

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 24 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

they keep talking about how it's for ecological protection but never explain what one thing has to do with the other. how does limiting umbrellas protect the environment?

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 24 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Unless I'm missing something, it's literally just that they think a beach full of umbrellas is ugly.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's not that people might leave them behind and junk up the beach and ocean?

I could believe any of these reasons, honestly.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

A beach umbrella doesn't seem like the kind of thing often left behind, whereas many smaller items would be. Still, based on the evident size of that beach, the effort seems fairly trivial for a public employee to take a quick look after closing time such as to remove potential umbrellas left behind.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

You'd think, but people leave behind the dumbest/most useful things sometimes.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

My 2nd sentence covers that possibility, tho.

[–] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 17 points 6 hours ago

This is far removed from coherent thought.

[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Think of the children under 10!

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 2 hours ago

And the children over 65 clearly don't take any shit from City Hall.

[–] mrmisses@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

They are.. they get umbrellas.