this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
124 points (98.4% liked)

Games

48864 readers
1226 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] observes_depths@aussie.zone 2 points 4 hours ago

I love watching shit companies commit suicide unintentionally

[–] FirmDistribution@lemmy.world 85 points 2 days ago

as it transforms under new CEO

We're not getting worse, we're ✨ transforming ☺️✨

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 52 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Always remember when there is a massive leadership shakeup - you are not safe. They have their own people, they are there because the last person fucked up (in their eyes). Never believe anything they say, you are not safe in your position.

They won't do it immediately. The first 90 days is them only observing, then at 6 months they have a plan. 6-12 months they'll be implementing their new plans. Never feel safe because "they've been here a couple of months and it's fine".

[–] Deconceptualist@leminal.space 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Heh,I learned this one the hard way. Thought I was safe because I cooperated and provided them all kinds of info, and I was rising up through management. But nope, they didn't give a damn about loyalty or anything, they just wanted a fresh slate and cut all kinds of people.

I feel you, I had a similar case. At the end of the day you're a line in a spreadsheet. Taught myself early that no matter how connected you are with a company, it doesn't matter at all. Family, friends, they matter. Work to live, because work will throw you away tomorrow if they want to. Your family will always be there.

[–] LostWanderer@fedia.io 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Like, whenever I hear a company mention layoffs, I always feel I shouldn't trust their aims. It won't help their situation if they aren't firing at full cylinders, it's hard to turn around a sinking ship when you have so few crew to do so.

[–] HeyJoe@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I agree with you, but generally the purpose is to get back to a small enough group that without that many moving parts you can seriously focus on the areas that still work to keep yourself alive while also rebuilding on the things you need help or want to pivot to. Ive seen it work in my company when i also had my doubts and its kind of crazy.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago

It's hard to know if they're laying off the good workers or the parasites that build up in big orgs.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How many of those positions will be refilled in India?

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The CEO is an LLM shill. So, none. They'll pivot to their "ai", then crash and burn because the mbas don't understand that the tech they keep pushing doesn't work

[–] northernlights@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

I mean in my layoffs they laid off our entire team once the AI was ready and they hired a few people with the same job title in india to check the output. These are not incompatible.

[–] Whitebrow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

And when it does they’ll pivot to ai again, but this time, actual Indians

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago

Hard to say, but at least by next quarter they'll turn a bigger profit, and that's all that matters is the shortsightedness of next quarter's gains.

[–] kosama@socel.net 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

@ampersandrew I just hope my darling #DOUBLEFINE survives!

:angrycry:

[–] ZephyrXero@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Came to say the same! The better not fucking touch it!

[–] Brokkr@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This CEO sounds worse than the last. With a declining brand, making games exclusive is only going to make the brand tank harder.

Their next system needs to be free, or nearly free (~$100), but with a required subscription. Game pass needs to switch to a model that has a lowest tier at $10 or $15 per month that allows 3 games per month (from the whole catalog, you pick the game and it uses 1 credit, resets at end of every month) up to a premium tier at $35 per month that has unlimited play. Free console with 3 year subscription to the premium tier.

Console specs should be 4k at 60 Hz. $900 without subscription. Announce this the day after Sony announces the PS6. Sony would be screwed, especially because they are already releasing most of their games to all consoles simultaneously (per the most recent summer games fest).

In 3 years, raise the price of the lowest tier to $20 with 5 credits per month. Offer a 6 month discount on a 1 year contract for any accounts which have completed their 3 year subscription.

[–] HarkMahlberg@kbin.earth 5 points 1 day ago

required subscription

allows 3 games per month

$900 without subscription (so I guess the subscription ISN'T required)

raise the price of the lowest tier

1 year contract

This is the funniest bait I've ever seen, I'm crying holy shit. The only thing it's missing is Drink Verification Can.

[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thankfully you aren't CEO then because this is the worst take I've heard about consoles.

MS just spent the entire generation proving exclusives matter and are reversing course now. Sony are also reversing course on going multiplatform with their major single player focused releases. If titles are all multiplatform they will go PC if they have it as it multi purpose and lots of people have dreams of being a successful streamer, or they stick with the platform that they already have to not lose their library which is overwhelmingly Sony.

Aim for 60hz 4k at what quality? Next Gen? Current Gen can barely do it for the biggest AAA titles. Meanwhile hardware costs are exploding and you'll get that 1k ish worth of hardware paid back on 10 then 20 bucks per month? So people rent your console for 6-8 years, the average span of a generation basically at cost?

It might be cool for an end user but it doesn't make an ounce of business sense, and you're naive if you think it would be a surprise to Sony if they did go ahead with it.

[–] Feyd@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The problem with the model of exclusives driving console purchases is that it only worked when people could afford multiple consoles. The combination of consoles and games being more expensive and them trying to double dip by requiring subscriptions for online play means most people are going to pick a platform instead of getting several like they used to, even if they would want to play some exclusive they can't.

[–] cheat700000007@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

The problem is the opposite. Your console has no purpose without exclusives if others have them.

You have money for 1 console. Console A has a set library. Console B has the same library plus 5 good games unavailable on A. Assuming price, quality and features are on par which they generally are: why would you choose console A?

[–] Brokkr@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

You summed it up pretty well. Consoles are basically dead at this point. Sony is hurting too.

Both companies badly mismanaged this last generation and there's a significant sentiment that the value of the consoles wasn't justified. Why would consumers want to buy another one?

Sony should have done the subscription model in the last generation. They would have buried Xbox.

Xbox has a chance now if they become a competitor to the steam machine, but the price will have to be much better than that system. If it isn't free, then it will need to offer steam as a marketplace.

The only way either system could survive any other way is if they went handheld like steam deck or switch, but that might be even harder.