this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
256 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

85392 readers
4188 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 hour ago

Haven't used chrome in years. The closest I've been to it is Brave, and I only use it when shit doesn't load on LibreWolf or IceRaven.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

Make it the end of Chrome instead.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 13 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

Why are people using chrome?

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 2 points 11 minutes ago* (last edited 10 minutes ago)

There was a time when Chrome was that much better. Since then, nothing else has been better enough to switch.

[–] dsilverz@catodon.rocks 1 points 13 minutes ago

!technology@lemmy.world

A few days ago, I had to use the Graphite image editor to refine a 3D scene I rendered in Blender. I'm a daily user of Waterfox, but for some reason, whenever I access the Graphite WebApp, it instantly grows in RAM usage, as the whole Waterfox freezes and crashes (which I found out to be a specifically a "core dump" kind of crash when I launched the browser from a terminal). Same for Librewolf. Then I had the idea of accessing Graphite through a spare Chromium (not Chrome, but still a Google thing) I unwittingly have to keep for development purposes, and suddenly it worked without a hassle, it didn't even require that much RAM.

This happens because Graphite, just like many webapps out there, was made with Chromium-based browsers in mind, likely using some esoteric features which are unavailable or badly implemented in Firefox-based browsers (an incompatibility of which indirectly affects Waterfox).

This, I guess, is part of why people still use Chromium-based browsers: because it became indistinguishable from Internet Explorer and its idiosyncratic features (ActiveX) back in 2000s, with most developers (including myself) coding webpages that used said features (think about having to deal with the filesystem: devs would either have to use Java or devs could use the cool FileSystemObject ActiveX; similar thing applies nowadays with some HTML5 APIs that can be quite useful for some webapps but are only properly implemented in Chromium). At least we used to have a "This site is better viewed in IE7 on Windows XP with a resolution of 1024 x 768 and Macromedia Flash Player installed" back then, now webpages can simply crash the whole browser when it doesn't refuse to load after an endless spinning animation.

Don't get me wrong: I would neither recommend Chromium, nor anything Google-related, for anyone, not even my worst enemies (a daily reminder for people, especially we Fediversers, to stop recommending the damn Youtube)... but this is the depressing reality of Web, and IT in general: things (some of which are sine qua non for "living in society" nowadays, such as internet banking and government platforms) that can only function in a specific platform/browser, be it Windows (when it comes to desktop platform), Android (when it comes to mobile) or Chromium (when it comes to the Web).

[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

The majority of people just can’t fucking be bothered, don’t fucking care or are completely unaware that there are other options.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Because some sites don't work unless you have Chrome.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 hours ago

I guess I don't use those sites then

[–] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

Especially on mobile... It's crazy how many times I tried to do a food order or some checkout process and mobile Firefox just hits some error.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.zip -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

There's always Brave. And yeah, I know there's some dilema going on out there, but it works for stuff that only loads on chrome.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 minutes ago

Ungoogled Chromium works, too.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 26 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Misleading headline, as UBlock Origin Lite will work.

….Which is what the vast majority of Chrome users would be using now anyway. Using full Ublock requires a ton of manual hoops (or a Chromium fork) already, and basically no one using plain Chrome at this point is gonna do that.


Not that this is okay.

I’m just saying it’s misleading. Full Ublock has already been evicted from Chrome for like 99.99% of its users, and sadly, they didn’t seem to care.

[–] amorpheus@lemmy.world 1 points 13 minutes ago

The Lite version works fine for me. Would I prefer the full version? Sure. But migrating to a different browser is not that high on the list of things I have energy for.

[–] medem@lemmy.wtf 14 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Who the fucking fuck still uses stock Chrome in 2026, chrissakes.

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 18 points 5 hours ago

everyone’s parents methinks. i got mine on chrome 15ish years ago and now they won’t stop. “but you’re the one that told us to use chrome…”

i get that a lot. it’s as if they cannot conceive that things that were once good can become shitty. enshittified if you will.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

The people using Chromium based browsers are all huge suckers. It's just a fact

[–] cubesthegamer@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago

I wouldn’t say anyone using Chromium. Brave and a few others are still good options. But Firefox is the goat of course.

[–] tirateimas@lemmy.pt 50 points 9 hours ago

Don't use Chrome

[–] sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io 8 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I'm using librewolf for most tasks but just FYI you can try ladybird with three lines of git and its coming along nicely. Additionally Kagi's WebKit browser Orion is looking really great and the flatpak for that is available right now.

Play with them and report bugs. These guys have been making serious progress this year.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I’m not sure I’d recommend Ladybird or Orion for general use yet. Orion is still getting there on Linux, ladybird is in deep development.

…Why not a good fork? Like Zen, Librewolf, or if you need Chromium compatibility, Helium?

[–] voytrekk@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Won't helium be affected by this change? They bundle Unlock Origin, so they will not be able to do that if they want to follow chromium still. They may have to swap to forking off Brave who uses their own blocking engine.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Indeed. Though they are still two versions away from depreciation:

https://github.com/imputnet/helium/issues/1746

No idea how they’ll handle it, but yeah, they could lift Brave’s engine. Cromite also has its own adblocker they could pull in as a patch.

[–] greybeard@feddit.online 3 points 6 hours ago

I'm excited that there are alternative browser engines being developed, but I lost a lot of enthusiasm for Ladybird when I learned more about the lead. Servo is another browser project coming along nicely, although Servo is closer to webkit than it is a fully fledged browser.

[–] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 123 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] squaresinger@lemmy.world 57 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I would so love if this causes an usage spike for Firefox, so that all websites and webapps start testing for Firefox compatibility again...

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 21 points 11 hours ago (5 children)

The install counts for ad block extensions is surprisingly lower than you'd think.

uBlock only peaked just shy of 30M users, so much less than 1% of general users. Obviously it's not that cut and dry, but you get the idea. It's unlikely they have much influence no matter where they go.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

If that were true, Google wouldn't be fighting them so hard.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

How many of those 3 billion Chrome users were on desktop though? Mobile is the default for most of the world.

[–] wltr@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 hour ago

Mobile Firefox has uBlock too, at least on Android.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] arsCynic@piefed.social 31 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

The Firefox forks that I use:

  • LibreWolf ships with uBlockOrigin by default.
  • Zen browser for power users who want lots of out of the box features and customization. An especially excellent browser for users who migrate from Vivaldi. Caveat, as with most feature-rich things, the line between bloat and feature can be a bit blurred.
[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Fyi, you won't be able to watch videos on Zen if you're on Windows. (Yes, you use Arch btw, and wouldn't be caught dead using Microslop products, thank you random commenter from the future. :^) )

[–] SlimePirate@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 8 hours ago

I use NixOS btw

[–] ItsComplicated@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 hours ago

How does Zen compare to Vivaldi with CPU usage?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I found Zen to be lightweight, actually. It seems to use a hair less RAM than vanilla FF, and the UI can be extremely minimal.

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 67 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If only there's a different web browser one can use... 🤔🤔

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 32 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Netscape Navigator baby 😎

[–] thlibos@thelemmy.club 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Pfft. Mosaic is where it's at.

[–] negativenull@piefed.world 5 points 6 hours ago

Lynx gang Rise UP!

[–] n4sdaq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 7 hours ago

Work forces Edge. Cannot install other browsers. I already have AdGuard Home running on my network. What else can I do?

[–] Antagnostic@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yes, it will. It’s already very finicky with chrome, and it will stop working:

https://github.com/dhowe/AdNauseam/wiki/Install-AdNauseam-on-Chromium-browsers

This will also be an existential issue for downstream browsers that ship Ublock, like Helium (though forks with their own blocker engine like Cromite or Brave will continue to work).

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Chrome is for work stuff, nothing else.

[–] lundah@lemmy.zip 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I can't really research a topic for work without an adblocker. The experience is too miserable, everything is riddled with advertisements!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Vince@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

I switched to uBlock Origin Lite when all this shit started up, is that one going away too?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Nope. Ublock lite was made for Manifest V2 depreciation, specifically.

It’s not as effective as full UBlock though. I notice it missing elements or bugging some pages out when I use it on others’ PCs.

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 2 points 8 hours ago

I thought this happened ages ago.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›