this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2026
206 points (95.2% liked)

Linux

65813 readers
1024 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/hardware/p/2144337/commodore-announces-linux-based-flip-phone-with-no-social-media-no-browser-the-callback

Linux-based phone still ‘runs 99% of Android apps’ so you can do more with it, if you wish.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] marcie@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 hour ago

499? hahahhaa

[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Commodore? C64 and Amiga Commodore? Well, it seems to be a new startup that simply bought and revived the trademark. Instead of a $500 paperweight, they should instead focus on affordable, Linux-based PCs and laptop. Perhaps they could build their own distro using an Amiga-esque filesystem. I would definitely daily-drive a Commodore-branded laptop.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago

Commodore as a brand has ruined every company that's ever bought it. Cursed brand some say.

[–] willington@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Look, I love the idea of a Linux phone.

But $500 and it manages my temptations for me? Fuck no.

The whole point of Linux is freedom.

Enough behavior shaping.

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 hours ago

Yeh right, i already don't use social media on my phone, skill issue

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Social media is humans being social through media, I am sick and tired of it being categorically villainized especially because the scientific evidence for it being inherently bad is laughable.

[–] BartyDeCanter@piefed.social 8 points 4 hours ago

While it seems like everyone here hates it, I’ve been looking for a minimal phone for when my current one dies. This seems to hit the exact sweet spot of functionality I want vs what I don’t want. As for the price, well, I’m spending at least that much on my next phone anyway so it seems fine by me.

And I have a huge nostalgia for flip phones and transparent electronics. So yeah, signed up to preorder.

[–] BottleBoardBakon@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 hours ago

That's easy too expensive for a phone with bad specs that just has blocked access to certain apps

[–] Stupendous@lemmy.world 34 points 7 hours ago

It's like that era of putting pink ribbons on everything for breast cancer that also signaled you were a supporter of women. Commercialized activism. Be real. This will sell very little. We'll get some news articles about how it's trending with Gen z that are rejecting technology and always online culture. It'll actually only be a small amount of Gen z but you know blogspam going to blogspam.

It's a crappy product. We need a Linux phone that would actually be a halo product for people to not feel like they're ripping themselves off to get away from Google and Apple

[–] AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev 53 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

MediaTek Helio G81 SoC, with 4GB/64GB

Uhhh. For $500? Sorry, no.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 48 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

I mean its a small company. We have become too used to subsidized costs at the sake of our privacy. Know why TVs are now $200? They are literal spyware in the home. Try buying one without spyware, $999 real fast for the same TV.

Know why phone companies give you a "free" $1000 phone? Youre the product. Constantly tracked and sold. A digital slave.

[–] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

Opposed to fake fast?

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 19 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Pinephone was a fraction of that price. Can't you run PostmarketOS on a Fair phone too? But that has much better specs.

[–] OccasionallyFeralya@lemmy.ml 12 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The pinephone was atrocious (As a daily) though. From what I’ve heard from owners it still struggles to this day to run basic mobile Linux OSes.

[–] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Fact. It's amazing that it exists, but it is definitely not a daily driver device. At least for me.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Uhh the pinephone in general sucks for daily use . its a tinker phone

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Really? I thought mine was great

[–] macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

Almost nothing works on it. Can make calls, but not receive, can open the camera, but not take a photo, etc.

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 hours ago

Buuutt are you someone who travels and uses airline and banking and hotel apps? Or do you stay home and use arch on a thinkpad ?

/joky

[–] Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world 14 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Phone companies dont give you a "free" $1000 phone, you're actually paying more for it via the monthly bill payments.

That's on top of you being the product as well.

load more comments (1 replies)

Economies of scale. How many people actually want to buy this?

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 17 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

So happy with my 2nd hand Pixel 8. No BS, ecologically acceptable IMHO and yes runs most Android apps.

[–] Wrongdoer2@sh.itjust.works 90 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Great initiative but at this price it's just a scam srlsy..

[–] ultimate_worrier@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 11 hours ago

My sentiments exactly. They’re charging $499 for $5-100 worth of hardware.

This is the “snakes on a plane” of phones.

[–] WhatsHerBucket@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

People pay over $1k for a phone. Now that is a scam.

[–] Thorned_Rose@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 hours ago

But those phones are mini computers, some of which people use as an actual desktop.

[–] placebo@lemmy.zip 22 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I get the idea of dumb phones, but $500 (or with taxes in Europe at least 600 EUR) for a phone that cannot even run a browser? This is ridiculous.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 41 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

How does it not have social media or browser if so many apps are compatible? Doesn’t that amount of compatibility mean we can still have social media and browsers?

[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 25 points 10 hours ago (8 children)

Based on the article, they have a blocklist of certain apps. You can only install apps they allow. Not sure how extensive the list is, but surely the most popular ones are blocked and they will probably update the list.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thingsiplay@lemmy.ml 22 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

My first thought was, this might be about just what's installed by default. Reading a bit further the article says:

Apparently, the OS has hard blocks to stop the installation of browsers and social media apps.

"Users are still able to sideload apps outside those that are blocked, using APK installer files..."

So I'm not sure why I would want pay 500 Dollars / Euros, just so they have control over what I can install and not. To me this would be a deal breaker. Also this seems to be "basically a custom version of the Jolla Sailfish OS", so there are probably "better" options using the same OS. And it only has 4GB of RAM? I am not impressed for the price and for the control.

load more comments
view more: next ›