this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
72 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

69865 readers
3501 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Futurism report highlights the reputational cost of publishing AI-generated content.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Toes@ani.social 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

CNET has been spam for a long time

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Any news site using Chatbots to right their articles should not be trusted.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 5 points 1 year ago

Wait.. is Wikipedia publishing original research?!?!??!

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Are these the people behind #1 malware site download.com? lmao should've been done ages ago

[–] drawerair@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I learned that Wikipedia has a "reliable sources" table thanks to this. I'll check it out.

I can't recall a time when I went to Cnet to read re tech. I get tech stuff from Youtube and Verge.

The Wikipedia folks didn't demote Cnet after 1 week of discussion. Not 1 month. Not 6 months. Were they giving Cnet time to change for the better?