4am

joined 1 year ago
[–] 4am@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There are situations where you might want to monitor water use (someone mentioned delaying cycles based on water softener status), or people like me who might need a phone reminder because I’ll forget I put a load in and get busy with something else and it’s nice if I don’t have the extra step of setting a timer and trying to get it just right.

The problem isn’t the connectivity, the problem is the proprietary cloud ecosystems. HomeAssistant is already a brilliant home automation hub, just make devices repairable and with local control and I’ll be a customer.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If smart options were actually smart you could do that.

With the right devices I’m certain this can be done with HomeAssistant, but everyone who makes these appliances wants to wall you into their cloud ecosystem and harvest your activity data.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 15 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think “default” on this context would refer to the search engine that is selected OOTB; Google is the default; the others are merely included. There can be only one default.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

FYI you can order them online

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

We had them before that but they were different and not a lot of stuff made use of them

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 22 points 8 months ago

And since the DMCA makes it illegal to circumvent copy protection, they just put copy protection on the software (sometimes laughably weak - still counts!) and if you try to get around the hardware lockout you’re officially breaking the lawwww

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

I think the argument is that the motivations society allowed him under capitalism are what drew him to do what he did, not just that he was some brilliant asshole but that he wanted to own the work those beneath him had done.

Lots of us who have spent our lives being told “yeahuh but that’s how it’s supposed to work!” probably have a hard time grappling the concept that just because it turns out good sometimes doesn’t mean we can’t do better.

So to the original point of the rebuttal - we’re lucky it only turned out like it did, and not way way worse (and some other high-on-capital folks have been busy proving that lately…)

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago

No one has made the argument that “Hamas are peaceful freedom fighters”

Israel isn’t allowed to melt all the Palestinians because Hamas did terrorism. What the fuck is so hard about that? Are you really such a sick fucking person that your mind cannot ever let you grapple with this?

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Just throwing in the usual comment that OPNSense is a pfSense fork with a nicer interface.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Maybe if the tool’s singular purpose was for killing. I think guns might be a better metaphor there. Explosives have legitimate uses and if you took the proper precautions to vet your customers then it’d be hard to blame you if someone convincingly forged credentials, for example.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I’ve paid for a few apps and I don’t want to find and/or pay for Android versions

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

I would ask them to prove that claim in court for starters.

I would ask them why they feel they’d be liable for users who installed and gave permission to an app that would use NFC readers for payments.

I would ask them why access to the NFC reader by a 3rd party app in any way allows access to Apple Pay’s stored, encrypted data (which it doesn’t need)

I would ask why permission settings and security validations couldn’t be made on API calls with the potential to be harmful. Even for third-party app stores, Apple could still require app reviews and code signing for any apps that want to conduct financial transactions; they just don’t want to because they’ll make less money from Apple Pay.

Apple often handholds user flows and restricts access to features because non-technical folks might be tricked into installing a malicious or insecure service, and Apple stuff is built for non/technical people. But, on the flipside, they often leverage this position to wall you into their garden. This is the problematic practice that needs to be addressed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›