Adderbox76

Not an assumption.

I freely admit that it's an anecdotal fallacy in that it's based entirely on my own experience and may or may not reflect the larger reality. But it would only be an assumption if it's something that I was just guessing was true, whereas I've been around the Linux world long enough to see it first hand.

Keeps jumping to the latest kernel instead of the latest stable release.

Blames nvidia for not keeping up...

I've been on Manjaro for years and have literally NEVER had your issue. Why, because I don't just automatically change to the latest kernel and then wonder why shit doesn't work.

After an update, it'll tell me if a newer kernel is available, I'll look at it and if its a new stable release I'll change to it with no issue because an NVIDIA update was likely included with that update.

Stop forcing early adoption on your computer and then blaming others when it fucks up your shit.

Aren't there alternative file explorers for Windows? Or did support for that kind of thing end with Windows 7?

Every single one of us, as kids, learned the concept of "garbage in, garbage out"; most likely in terms of diet and food intake.

And yet every AI cultist makes the shocked pikachu face when they figure out that trying to improve your LLM by feeding it on data generated by literally the inferior LLM you're trying to improve, is an exercise in diminishing returns and generational degradation in quality.

Why has the world gotten both "more intelligent" and yet fundamentally more stupid at the same time? Serious question.

Can't do it. Gotta poop at home. Thankfully I'm in a small community where getting home and back again is quick enough to not be missed.

Please don't lump us all together.

The full saying is "Free as in Speech, not Free as in Beer"

Basically the "Free" in free means that it's free to do with as you please, modify, etc... But not free as in "here's a free product...like getting a free beer"

I'm not really talking about development as simply programming. There are a lot of aspects that go into development, yes...programming is a big aspect.

But there's also bug reporting (every user should know how to report bugs because it's contributes to making the program better).

Heck, you can even download the documentation and give it a proof-read if you're good with grammar and spot some errors if you don't want to commit to helping to write it.

I know a lot of people who spend a lot of time in the various subs for the software, taking care to answer questions from other users who need help doing this or that. That again, is contributing.

Then there's simply what we're doing right now. Bringing attention to the projects online getting them more visibility.

Development of a successful FOSS app isn't just about programming. And even small contributions count. If you can donate some coin, great! If you can't, or don't want to, there are a thousand other things that you can do to contribute to that apps community.

I emphasized the word community because that is exactly what it is. The ethos of Open Source; what makes it different than Propietary software, is that the users are an inherent part of the development process in ways both big and small. In propietary software, there is a distinct line between the developers and the users. Developers have multiple stakeholders of which the user base is certainly one, but also include advertisers, software makers, hardware makers, etc...

FOSS software, in contrast, is much more a communitee effort with the involvement of the community in the way of bug reports, literature, education and even simply championing the project because they don't have millions of dollars in advertising budgets.

Sorry, I get a little passionate, so this is longer than I intended it to be.

But tl;dr, contributing isn't just about money or just about programming. There's a thousand ways big and small, and my issue isn't with people not "paying" necessarily. But people who use it for free and don't bother filing bug reports, don't join the community online to help answer user questions, etc...

A good FOSS citizen should be an active part of the community. Or donate money to the project if they'd rather not.

This software is extensively free (as in beer)

No...it's not. It's free to download and to use, but the expectation that people contribute in exchange for using it is how FOSS has always worked.

That doesn't necessarily mean monetary. But contributing can be helping with user guides, or making youtube tutorials, or even just extending the reach of the program to friends and family by talking about it.

There are many ways to contribute, and money is one. But the notion that Open Source software is "free as in beer" has never been correct. Users have an expectation to contribute...period.

Unfortunately, there has always been the issue that a not-insignificant percentage of users of FOSS software believe the FREE part means "free as in beer" and take umbrage when asked to contribute.

I've long been a proponent (and I know I'm in a minority) that has advocated for a shift in the marketing of FOSS applications from "donation based" to "value based". Meaning that the expectation is that if you enjoy the software, you pay an amount that you believe is commensurate to your use. This is voluntarily of course...if you can't pay, than please use it and enjoy it. But those who can pay, should pay...at least a little bit, to offset the costs for those who can't.

It's more or less that the wording of FOSS apps needs to change so that you are expected to contribute if you can.

Just my opinion. Like I said, I know I'm in the minority. Just not a fan of the percentage of users that has always existed that (falsely) think that asking for money for your project is somehow anathema to the Open Source ideal and whine whenever they're asked to contribute.

Our point of sale software doesn't work with it. So they blocked the update until it does.

Well....that's certainly a sentence I read today that I didn't think I would.