BeigeAgenda

joined 2 years ago
[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

No it's the one it replies with

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

They double the fine each week so it will reach a googol eventually.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 11 points 11 months ago

I for one, salute their life long war against weed one blunt at a time.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 10 points 11 months ago

Finally a use for the croissant emoji: 🥐🪦😭

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

It's definitely off topic.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

There's no analogy, because windows users are not fleeing.

I read it as a "wish for people to get fed up with windows" comment, and not a "windows users are nazis" comment.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

We need to see how the run and fight animations look like!

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

1000017070

Hot bullets get your hot bullets!

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Okay the dictionary is wrong, do you have a better dictionary?

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

That's chicken change, when one person can destroy a $44 billion tech company.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

2pt... Had an important point: piracy = copyright infringement.

Blocking ads is a ToS violation, not piracy.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I understand your reasoning for calling ad-blocking for piracy, but I'm not sure I agree, or else we have to split "piracy" into degrees.

view more: ‹ prev next ›