BigHeadMode

joined 2 years ago
 

I have a laptop with an 11 inch screen and 768p display. Naturally, my usage breakdown is:

  • 80% one window in fullscreen
  • 15% two windows side by side
  • 5% other

I've considered tiling window managers. I used i3wm on this in the past. It was a little complicated and I customized the bottom bar to show commands for dummies.

alt-Enter: term | alt-D: launch | alt-F: fullsc | alt-1: new workspace | alt-shift-1: move to workspace

That plus some battery, wifi, time info. I never got 'good' with i3 and would consult the cheat sheet regularly.

Is there a paradigm (tiling or otherwise) that would let me quickly and simply launch programs with the keyboard (like most distros these days) and switch between fullscreen windows? and set them side by side as needed?

My usage is keyboard-first but mouse-available. i3 didn't seem tailored to mouse usage the way some other tiling wms are. and sometimes you'd launch a program like the wifi settings window and it wasn't built to be resized for a twm, so it looked weird. (no floating window support.)

99% is ubuntu lts + ansible playbook that removes snap, disables A TON of update naggings, installs flatpak, coupla apps and systemd timer to autoupdate all flatpaks

Is this public?

Try locally. Facebook marketplace is huge in the USA. It's a royal pain to sell tech offline, so you get good deals. Selection is worse so just broaden your search or be patient.

Business laptops are more rugged and serviceable. 4chan's /g/ has a thread for "thinkpad general" which is all the business laptops. (Mind the 4chan racism and transphobia.) I've found that Dells are far more common (and thus cheap) than comparable HPs or Thinkpads.

For some price comparison, I sold a 6th gen Intel Dell laptop with a 1080p screen for about $60. On ebay they run $40-$100.

[–] BigHeadMode@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

ARM Chromebook running non-chrome is, afaik, barely functional to get to a terminal. Don't think of running anything Linux on them unless you really like hardware development.

[–] BigHeadMode@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's case-by-case. Fascists are going to invade and appropriate every shred of culture they can find. But some of their choice culture is so toxic that they will own it for a long time. "Final Solution" and "Concentration Camp". But others like "living space" are probably not forever nazi.

Do you have any more info? I see there's an exploit called "boothole" as well as several Windows bootloaders that are vulnerable. https://eclypsium.com/blog/boothole-how-it-started-how-its-going/

 

I got an old HP laptop for a good price. (HP ProBook 650 G4.) It was cheap because it's BIOS locked and requires secure boot. (I believe this is the same as "HP Sure Start".)

Game over, right? Not quite. It still boots secure boot enabled Linuxes. I've installed Fedora with no problems. But I would like the ability to install any modern Linux OS.

To be clear, I have no security concerns subverting secure boot. I only have it on because my BIOS is locked.

There are a few methods that are too hard/expensive:

  1. creating my own exploit by referencing the patch notes of later firmwares (theoretically possible)
  2. dumping the BIOS myself and getting the BIOS password that way (it's been done on this model)
  3. Figuring out the undocumented backdoor HP used until around 2018 to reset BIOS passwords. (It's unclear if the backdoor is patched, or just no longer being used.)

I almost got what I want. I booted Ventoy via USB, and the laptop prompted me to enroll the Ventoy key in the secure boot system. I can boot any ISO I want from Ventoy. I can also boot Ventoy, and do LocalBoot (F4) via Ventoy into an unsigned locally installed OS. I booted Arch this way.

I just installed Mint Cinnamon and it prompted me during install for "3rd party drivers" as well as "enable secure boot". It required an 8 character password (mint requirement or UEFI requirement?) which was required in UEFI on reboot (one time). Then I enrolled the key in secure boot and now I can boot straight into Mint. The install prompt was:

Installing third-party drivers requires configuring Secure boot. To do this, you need to choose a security key now, and enter it when the system restarts (Learn more)

You have chosen to enable third-party software as part of your install, which this system includes hardware drivers for graphics and/or Wi-Fi hardware. Your system also has UEFI Secure Boot enabled. UEFI Secure boot needs to be configured to allow the use of this third-party drivers.

According to Reddit:

  • No, third-party drivers do not _need_ Secure boot
  • No, the installation wizard also doesn't say you need Secure boot for those drivers, it is warning you that you have secure boot enabled, thus special considerations will be necessary

What's the easiest way to get insecure-boot-like behavior on this device? I was thinking I need to get rEFInd on here so it can search for any relevant OS. I also am not clear on how to install OSs properly in this environment (OSs want to change/configure the bootloader themselves). I'm hoping to install to an NVMe drive, but SATA, USB, and network boot (ha) are options too.

Alternatively, how can I do what Mint did on the install on other Linuxes?

I have a basic understanding of the secure boot "shim" and the cryptography in secure boot, but definitely no practical knowledge.

(I prefer to say BIOS over "UEFI" despite being technically incorrect.)

edit: Still don't know what I'm doing, but Fedora (and thus Bazzite) supported secure boot. I just ran the Bazzite installer, rebooted when prompted, and entered secureblue as the key password. https://docs.bazzite.gg/General/Installation_Guide/secure_boot/

21
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by BigHeadMode@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
 

I am a prolific retweeter. I also see many instances prohibit nsfw, or some prohibit nsfw without a cw, or without a specific cw. Many servers have 5 or 10 categories of content that must be CWd. If I boost/retoot a post from another mastodon instance, what does that look like for other users of my instance? Does it show up in the local feed? If I boost an untagged nsfw or otherwise 'bad' content under the local rules, is that moderate-able (bad for the retooter)?

I intend to mark my profile as sensitive and put every post of mine behind a CW.