ColeSloth

joined 1 year ago
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Yeah....there's actually a bunch of e bike companies that are US based that do all the design and spec work in the US and are built at various places overseas. EBC builds em in the US, using mostly overseas parts. As far as "design generations" go the US is one of the global leaders. Juiced and Rad Power have both been making e bikes for 15 years, bucko.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 6 months ago (17 children)

Good. The US can make e bikes. The problem is that the tariffs need to be solidified in place for a minimum of 10 years or manufacturers won't invest in the infrastructure to make them. If the tariffs seem likely to go away soon, no one will bother doing it on a large scale. All the Chinese made batteries are garbage, anyhow. There's only a handful of actual quality small lithium batteries and they're samsung, panasonic, Westinghouse, and miel. The ones from china horribly lie about capacity and start failing way too soon. There's a reason all the power tool batteries inside Dewalt and makita and such never use Chinese batts inside. Same for all the high end cordless vacuums. You open up a dyson battery pack, you'll never find chinesium.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 months ago (6 children)

How's it play on the Steam Deck, now? It a good experience?

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago

Yes. I've looked at a lot of production break downs of publicly traded companies before on what electronic and phone manufacturers pay in parts and it is so much cheaper than you would think some items could even be made for. They might have been losing a bit on the cheapest $360 one, but I'd bet they made a bit on the mid and top tier.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They didn't lose money on it. It's just that they made so little no other company would mess with making something like it for such small margins.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Holy fuck that's clever and original.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 months ago

I mean, realistically, there's just no way the airline would have been providing that defense. The PR would be a thousand times worse than the bit of payout to the 9 year olds family would be.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Easy to solve.

Buy one of those electric hand warmers and wedge it between the two thermostats.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Even if they did want to give up their phones, they wouldn't for anything with a two to four hour device. Let alone something that only has a mild neato factor of a low powered laser projector. Smart watches do the same shit with a longer battery life and virtually no one's replacing their phones with those, either.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Scam how? Selling pre-launch could have been a scam. Money taken from investors could have been a scam, depending on what they pitched. But selling after a complete and known flop of a release? There's no cards left on the table to be scammy about. "Here's our brand name. Here's our patent collection. We'd like to think our patents are worth a ton of money, but we know we'd be lucky getting twenty million."

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 months ago

Now we're talking. I wonder if I can set up the apk I use for Lemmy (Thunder) to use ff instead of chrome. Time to check some stuff.

view more: ‹ prev next ›