DokPsy

What I'd like to become the standard is:

If the question makes it super obvious the asker has zero clue what they're asking or trying to do, lightly correct and steer them to beginner friendly resources.

If the question is competent but focusing the wrong direction or will lead to a bad habit, essentially, they know just enough to be dangerous but they're about to be dangerous, more pointed and technical correction and steering them to either articles or better search terms to use.

If it's a pointed question with the information to show they've done the normal information gathering and either need opinions that are beyond the theory or book standard information or they don't answer the question, answer the question. Ideally also giving sources to back up your answers.

Bonus points if you can do the above without coming across as a dick. Unless they ask to ask. You can be a dick to those people.

I would find it hilarious if it sparks class solidarity, personally

Currently in an MSP. It's all on the company culture as to if it's shit or not. We're fully wfh with no plans to move back to the office.

Overtime is never forced. If we have to work through lunch because all hell is breaking loose, we're practically encouraged to leave an hour early unless the CEO is allowing ot and we want it. No pressure either direction.

If users are rude or generally hard to deal with, manager has our back in dealing with them.

Pay isn't top dollar but there's trade-offs

Avalynne O’Brien is pretty close

I can only hope that the anti solar groups are arguing in bad faith when they complain about how the sun works.

Either that or: they actually think that pro solar doesn't understand this fact or one of the two groups doesn't know how to pair solar with batteries.

Sometimes you need a hard copy