this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
1405 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

73664 readers
4174 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] octobob@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 hour ago

Already did this ages ago. Been building a collection for decades now. I'm pushing about 10k albums on the NAS. Haven't had spotify since like 2018

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago

just buy releases from bands on Bandcamp

[–] r_deckard@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

www.live365.com/listen

No account or subscription required.

Hundreds of internet radio stations. Some are ad-supported, some are ad-free but you can contribute to the station's patreon.

[–] MyNamesTotallyRobert@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I have never in my entire life paid for a streaming service. I didn't stop pirating when Netflix was the only game in town and cost $8 / month. I didn't pay for streaming even when every normie started getting internet access and "everyone was doing it". Even during the high point of my life where I was not only gainfully employed but also able to accumulate savings I STILL never had a streaming service. You could count the self hosting spotify clone I made as a "streaming service" but I'm not paying extra money or probably supporting people with different ideological beliefs than me in order to use it so that really doesn't count.

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Back in the day, Grooveshark was the king before all these subscription guys showed up.

[–] fading_person@lemmy.zip 33 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

Don't threaten, just do it!

I don't get why people are so stubborn to move away from corporate products.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

people like having their stuff.

[–] fading_person@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Well... with streaming services people don't actually have anything, because nothing in there is theirs to own ;)

[–] archchan@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Personally, the open source community's aversion to algorithms is what's holding me back. Say what you will about them, but I've found many great songs thanks to Spotify's algo.

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Soulseeks recommendation algorithm is top notch, almost organic. You click the 'browse users files' button.

[–] yonderbarn@lazysoci.al 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't use any proprietary apps. Only FOSS apps on my phone.

[–] fading_person@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Hope you're enjoying the freedom, fellow FOSSer :)

[–] yonderbarn@lazysoci.al 2 points 3 hours ago

Sometimes I feel like it's just too simple. Then I see articles like this and I'm like nope. Staying away from that bullshit.

[–] obvs@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I switched to Qobuz about two weeks ago. I've been really impressed.

[–] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Is this FOSS? Is it on GitHub or can I get it from another app store like F-Droid?

[–] Mondez@lemdro.id 17 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's a load of bullshit, for a start the ISP has my details and should be able to attest my connection is rented by someone of legal age and it should be up to me what I let my children (assuming I have any) see and not see on that connection. I already had to click the "yes just give me the porn damn it" agreement on my mobile phone which was less likely to be randomly shared unmonitored and now this overbearing crap. I'll just avoid sites and services that require this.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I’ll just avoid sites and services that require this.

It's not the site wanting to do it. It's a requirement from Parliament in the UK.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Online_Safety_Act_2023

The Online Safety Act 2023[1][2][3] (c. 50) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom to regulate online content. It was passed on 26 October 2023 and gives the relevant Secretary of State the power to designate, suppress, and record a wide range of online content that is deemed "illegal" or "harmful to children".[4][5]

The Act creates a new duty of care for online platforms, requiring them to take action against illegal content, or legal content that could be "harmful" to children where children are likely to access it. Platforms failing this duty would be liable to fines of up to £18 million or 10% of their annual turnover, whichever is higher. It also empowers Ofcom to block access to particular websites. It obliges large social media platforms not to remove, and to preserve access to, journalistic or "democratically important" content such as user comments on political parties and issues.

I mean, you don't have to go there if you want, but it's probably Parliament you want to be irritated with, not websites following British laws.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

There are fans of Spotify?

[–] thatradomguy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

It's their silly little way of saying conned subscription holders.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I could tell Spotify was trash when I first heard about it. That Spotify decided to enshitify their already bad site makes it even worse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Just a friendly reminder that the OSA was never about safeguarding kids from seeing porn.

Are the government seriously worried about a child being exposed to Break Stuff or So What on Spotify?

[–] art@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Who could have guessed this very obvious a most expected outcome?! Not Spotify, I guess.

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 19 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

You're way better off with your own music collection. That is what I have. I use Tauon music box it handles large playlists well.

[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Ngl, right now I'm endevouring to acquire more music in digital file format rather than streaming right now. Spotify is great, especially when your looking for individual songs that you'll only listen to a handful of times, and for discovering music, but once you lose access to it you're pretty fucked.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 5 points 5 hours ago

At this point even the music discovery is being enshitified with AI bands taking up more and more space as low-cost filler.

The last 10 years of the internet are committing seppuku in front of us. Gird your musical loins, friend. We'll need jams in MP3 format in the dystopian hellscape that's rushing to meet us.

[–] ckmnstr@lemmy.world 58 points 10 hours ago

Don't threaten, just do it. Enshittification must end.

The only reason we have mainstream paid video streaming now is because early Netflix was genuinely better than dodgy, pop-up riddled mirrors on movie4k.to. The convenience was well worth 8 bucks a month. Same for Spotify.

Fast forward 10 years and Spotify wants me to pay 15 €, scan my face and listen to forced podcast ads AND pay extra for paywalled audiobooks that used to be free? Meet my good old friend youtube-downloader, then.

[–] Newsteinleo@infosec.pub 26 points 10 hours ago

Its as if law makers don't learn from history. Do they not know what happened in the 90s and early 2000s when stores wouldn't sell M rated video games or CDs with mature content labels? We found ways to get around that. We would go to stores that didn't check or care, got our older sibling or friend to buy it for us. We burned copies of our friends CDs, or downloaded stuff off line with Limewire and Napster.

Same shit when there was prohibition in the US. People drove cars across the great lakes to bring alcohol into the US. People brewed there own spirits in bathtubs with radiator coils.

If people want to anomalously watch their favorite weird kinky shit or listing to music they like, they're going to find a way. And, if the easiest way to do that is through piracy, that is what they are going to do.

[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 41 points 12 hours ago (5 children)

I mean, fuck Spotify and all that, but this one is really the UK government's doing.

And soon, this shit will come to every country. They're all drafting laws to mandate real age verification for adult content. The UK is just the first to implement it.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, fuck it. At this point we might as well put our passport numbers in the HTTP headers.

Coming to a pop up near you. If they even bother to ask any more.

[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I think there are going to be a whole lot of phishing and blackmail scams in the future, preying on the stupid computer illiterate masses putting in their personal information into fake "age verifiers" to access porn or other adult content.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 2 points 5 hours ago

It's a good thing it's so easy to tell them from the "trustworthy" ones...

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 26 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

This age-verification bullshit is a fine example of how governments represent their rulers, not their citizens.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JimVanDeventer@lemmy.world 11 points 9 hours ago

Spotify fans?

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 35 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The streaming services are run by shithead C-suites who think last quarter is the way it's always been. They forget the only reason most of us use their services is someone more visionary than them made it more convenient than piracy half a generation ago. Let's remind them there's an alternative.

[–] btaf45@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I have like 5 alternates I would use before Spotify.

[–] haloduder@thelemmy.club 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

This is another step closer to requiring an ID to use the internet at all, which is exactly what the ruling class wants.

Fight back wherever you can.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Never understood Spotifys appeal. Youtube has always been better imo.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Allemaniac@lemmy.world 55 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

what are "spotify fans"? Spotify paid 150k $ for Trump's inauguration party, f them. They do not deserve my money

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›