I'm honestly not convinced voting machines are a good idea, especially proprietary ones. You are asking everyone to blindly trust the intentions of the company making them. You also risk bugs and hacks.
Public elections need to be transparent, and easy to oversee, voting machines makes that much harder.
Three mile island did not have a meltdown, ffs. Not even close.
"The Three Mile Island accident was a partial nuclear meltdown"
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Mile_Island_accident
tbf, the idiots getting sold the ride arent the ones supposed to be experts,
sees happy person
gets mad
presumably his entourage of secret service people were in contact with Kamala's entourage of secret service people, and they were at no point worried of any threat of physical harm.
how do you mean? they just "hydra'd" on him. If he wants to sue them now for leaving xitter he will have to go after them individually.
Yes, yes it is if you run bitlocker with external verification.
It's even harder if the server you use for the verification itself is down.
No it doesn't, nowhere does it say that.
SkySolver and Crew Web Access, look “historic like they were designed on Windows 95”. The fact that they are also available as mobile applications should further make it clear that no, these applications are not running on Windows 3.1 or Windows 95.
On the search side, i'm really impressed with kagi. They are a paid service, but you can try them out for free no strings attached.
"like" being a very important word in that sentence.
One problem that remains even with your theoretical machine is that non technical people are left behind in the verification process. It can be argued that a voting and verification method that is opaque to quite a significant part of the population is undemocratic.