For someone sharing OP's opinion, simply "not using it" wouldn't solve anything. Most of the problems OP lists is stems from that people in general use them.
I'm not saying you should agree with OP, but your argument misses the point.
FiskFisk33
joined 2 years ago
wut? never heard of that, but I guess I never looked really. Unsavory how?
free roaming domesticated animals are a pest on the ecosystems, but we do european bees on a completely different scale
kagi is actually a pretty good, quite unknown search engine. I strongly prefer it to google.
There is always an xkcd!
So many times I google something obscure, the top result is the same question asked on some forum with a single reply, "just google it"
And that it looses data after merely a few milliseconds if left alone, that to account for that, DDR5 reads and rewrites unused data every 32ms.
♫ That's a chargeback ♫
technically yes, difference is one is backed by a nation state, the other is backed by a teenager...
A million isn't even close.
There's about a few million characters in shakespeares works. That means the chance of typing it randomly is very conservatively 1 in 26^1000000^
if a monkey types a million characters a week the amount of "attempts" a million monkeys makes in a million years is somewhere in the order of 52000000*1000000*1000000 = 5.2 × 10^19^
The difference is hillriously big. Like, if we multiply both the monkey amount and the number of years by the number of atoms in the knowable universe it still isn't even getting close.
Here you go, I think you lost these: "He", "They"
why cant we ever just have something good.
oh well, ill be keeping my eyes open for alternatives, this is bad but still better than google I guess.