FlowVoid

joined 2 years ago
[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago

The MAG7 operate large and growing cloud services, so their datacenter costs would grow even without any AI training.

And charging $5 for a video query does not mean the query uses $5 of energy. The query is priced to recoup training costs that were already incurred.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

That article doesn't say what you imply it does. Companies may be using ChatGPT to grow, but that doesn't mean they are training AIs.

And the distinction is critical to energy usage. Training a new AI uses a lot of energy. Querying an existing AI uses far less.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I'm not sure that's true. Every company uses storage, and every growing company needs more. But very few companies are training generative AIs.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Datacenter != AI

If you are using the internet for anything with cloud storage, you are contributing to datacenter growth. And that includes nearly everyone using social media.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Like saying goodbye to a crazy neighbor you know.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

To disable suggestions:

"Alexa, stop By The Way"

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (8 children)

only rich folks or those who are willing to accept money from venture capitalists

Or non-profits that are willing to accept money from supporters.

ActivityPub already existed when they started BlueSky. They chose to not make their protocol compatible.

Because AT protocol has features that are incompatible with ActivityPub, and those features are important to some users.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Uh no, the AI didn't crack any problem.

The AI produced the same hypothesis that a scientist produced, one that the scientist considered his own original awesome idea.

But the truth is that science is less about producing awesome ideas and more about proving them. And AI did nothing in this regard, except to remind scientists that their original awesome ideas are often not so original.

There's even a term scientists use when another scientist has the same idea but actually managed to do the work of proving it: "scooped". It's a very common occurrence. It didn't happen here.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yes, but that does not mean they want to be publicly traded.

There are plenty of privately held for-profit companies, for example Valve. Their business model does not involve stock prices, in fact it is impossible to buy Valve stock.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I doubt that's their plan, since they aren't on the stock market.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world -1 points 8 months ago

You can get much better rates if you are willing to lock your savings in for at least few months. Short term treasury bonds are 4-5% right now.

[–] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I don't care if companies speculate or if they make a profit.

view more: next ›