GreyEyedGhost

joined 2 years ago
[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, I always had trouble with known adulterers in my church tut tutting about homosexuality. It's the same rule!

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

They have both options in Canada, it's basically lease vs. loan. They really push the lease option these days, though.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

We'll have to disagree with the ribbon being an improvement, but the rest definitely count.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If MS had put any focus on allowing skins/themes for Windows, the touch market would have just been an extra feature. There is no technical reason they couldn't have, as evidenced by the third-party apps that allowed legacy skins on previous versions, such as 8 and 10. But they needed that lock-in and forced experience, rather than giving people the choice.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

There are decent GUI installers for most, if not all, major Linux distros. They may not be as full-featured as the CLI versions, but they are sufficient for average users.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Yes, Win2k, WinXP, and Win7 were all major leaps forward in various areas. Imagine if 8 had been just a major cleanup of Windows 7 and unifying the various settings paradigms, how much better that would have been.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago

It was a pretty good game a year or so in, and has only gotten better. I haven't played for a while, but I put over 100 hours in first.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

I used to think there was nothing more stupid in zombie movies than uninfected humans just leaving each other alone and killing off the zombies. Why would you bother taking guns from other people when you have so many just lying around after 90% of the people died? If everyone just killed 10 zombies, the whole thing would be cleared up. I don't think that anymore.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately, for the scenario I was replying to, a lot of the times when you're doing support, you can't see the user's screen and are limited to verbal communication, so verifying what they typed or the output can lead to just as many problems. Any support scenario where you're talking the other person through a series of tasks will be very dependent on how familiar each person is with the task you're supporting. And no one Rs TFM these days, if you even get one.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Just try to verbally describe the difference between a bracket, brace, or parenthesis, or forward slash vs backslash. I'm sure it will be fine. But absolutely, a text-based interface is easier to describe in text.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Oh, I have. Now imagine giving those people a command line.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 months ago (6 children)

As someone who read at least 2/3 of the DOS 6 manual when it came out, and have used a variety of Linux flavors as well, a command prompt is the least helpful interface devised. What do you type there? How do you let the computer know when you're done typing? If the answers seem obvious to you, think about why, and what on the screen would point you that way if you hadn't had training. People are very visual, in general, and a simple interface such as a mouse that directs focus and has a minimal amount of interaction options is far easier to get started with, especially if the GUI has culturally intuitive icons (save needs updating).

I don't think the power of the command line, or text interfaces in general, can be overstated, but even the most helpful text interfaces, such as those found in some IDEs, require prior knowledge to be useful. This isn't going to work for the majority of people.

view more: ‹ prev next ›