HelixDab2

joined 1 year ago
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, I have, and I got stiffed out weeks of pay I was owed because it was with a fly-by-night contractor that had a nose-candy problem. ...Which is why I don't do that any more. (Plus, he insisted on doing shit in the most backassward, bullshit way. I'll be surprised if his shit doesn't kill someone some day.)

If you work for a reputable company--not as a 1099 contractor, which is self-employed--then you probably have to be paid overtime pay. If you get a W2, and you're not getting OT when you have to put in more than 40 hours in a week, then you need to consult with an employment attorney.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Disagree; most people that work outside are still working for a wage, and OT pay kicks in once you break 40 hours in a week. That limits most places to 8 hours, unless you're talking about undocumented immigrants that don't have any labor protections, or people that are self-employed in some way.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Doesn't bother me; it's 2 minutes to spray it on, and then re-apply every hour that I'm outside. As long as I'm wearing a hat to shade my face, I don't have to worry about putting any on my face, and then sweating it into my eyes.

Doing hard manual labor in the mid-day sun at the height of summer though? That's def. unpleasant as fuck. I can do 2-5 hours, and then I'm just done for the day. I don't know how some people can do that for eight hours a day, day in and day out.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 46 points 1 month ago (9 children)

I love WEARING SUNGLASSES.

I love WEARING A HAT.

I love DRINKING WATER.

I Love WEARING SUNBLOCK.

Jesus christ dude, if you get yourself into some kind of shape that isn't round, you aren't going to have these problems.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

If the customer base skews wealthier, you're going to have more people shopping there that are pulling in $500k+ annually, and probably a handful that are pulling in over $1M. If you only have one bottle in that price range, but you have 100 members at a given location that have enough income where that seems like a reasonable purchase, then you're probably going to be able to sell it.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There's a bar in Chicago, Lady Gregory's, that has a whiskey bible. They will sell you 40yo Scottish single-malt whiskey--they have multiple choices, including from distilleries that have been out of business longer than I've been alive--by the dram, at up to about $250 per dram (as of the last time I was there, in 2016). Assuming that they're using the American standard dram measurement of 4ml/dram, that works out to up to $46,000 for an entire bottle.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

People that shop at Costco skew far wealthier than the average American. Given that only a few Costcos, in very wealthy areas, are going to have even a single bottle of $28,000 whiskey, it's entirely reasonable to expect that they're going to be able to sell it.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

Off the top of my head, the only one that I've watched in recent memory was Fallout.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 51 points 1 month ago (11 children)

That's okay, I'll ramp up my piracy of Amazon-exclusive shows in 2025 too.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

But the point of saying that certain things are dealbreakers is that, outside of those, anything is within the realm of possibility.

Do I prefer people with "extreme" body modifications? Sure. Is that a requirement? No.

With food, maybe I prefer Brazilian steakhouses, but the only thing I really dislike is pasta, sandwiches, and deep-fried everything. I'm not going to exclude Thai, Indian, Ethiopian, or Polish food, just because it's not my favorite kind of restaurant. I'm literally going to be fine with anything that isn't on my dislike list.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Deal breakers are things that are limits. Limits are--in general--a good thing. It's not that you're saying that women--or people in general--are fungible, but you're saying that people that fit any of these criteria won't work.

IIRC, Dan Savage has said that there's no settling down without settling. You can--should--have limits, but if it's more than five things, you need to look at yourself very, very closely. You aren't going to like every single thing about your partner, but you have to be able to accept them.

I could say, for instance, that I prefer people that are heavily tattooed, pierced, scarred, branded, and implanted. (...Which limits me to about .0001% of the US population.) But that's not a deal breaker; I'm not going to reject someone because they don't fit that particular preference, even though my body modification is important to me. On the other hand, I absolutely will not date anyone that doesn't have a worldview that's grounded in reality, e.g., is religious/"spiritual", or believes in any conspiratorial nonsense, because I couldn't have respect for a person like that. THAT'S a deal breaker. I won't date someone that wants children; I'm unfit to be a parent, and I had myself sterilized a number of years ago. Again: that's a deal breaker, because as with religious garbage, it's a question of basic values.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 10 points 2 months ago

Most people think it is just in the realm of dietary preferences and cuisine and don’t know why.

And yet, if you said something about black people and watermelon or fried chicken, or Chinese people and cats, you would immediately be treated like a racist, because you would be.

view more: ‹ prev next ›