I've had this happen twice in two weeks since installing Watchtower and have since scheduled it to only run on Friday evening...
IronKrill
I've been happily using Windscribe for a while now, they have port forwarding with a dedicated IP. Averaging out the separate charges, it's about $4 USD/month for a custom plan (1 location + unlimited data) + dedicated IP. Technically their Pro tier includes ephemeral port forwarding, but I don't like how it works.
I'm using Gluetun via Docker Compose as well right now and can happily say all the ports exposed via the ports:
setting are local network only. I could port forward them via the router probably (haven't tried) but I only use them for access via LAN. To expose ports over the VPN connection you use the FIREWALL_VPN_INPUT_PORTS
environment variable. A stripped version of my current compose (example port numbers, not real) with LAN access to 6000
and WAN access to 1234
and 5678
:
services:
gluetun:
image: qmcgaw/gluetun:latest
restart: unless-stopped
container_name: gluetun
cap_add:
- NET_ADMIN # in the default compose file i dunno what this does tbh
environment:
- VPN_SERVICE_PROVIDER=custom
- VPN_TYPE=openvpn
- OPENVPN_VERSION=<redacted>
- OPENVPN_USER=<redacted>
- OPENVPN_PASSWORD=<redacted>
- OPENVPN_CUSTOM_CONFIG=/gluetun/custom.ovpn
- FIREWALL_VPN_INPUT_PORTS=1234,5678 # allows ports through VPN connection
- FIREWALL_OUTBOUND_SUBNETS=192.168.0.0/24 # I found that I needed this for certain LAN access
ports:
- 6000:6000 # port i access via LAN
volumes:
- /mnt/example/config.ovpn:/gluetun/custom.ovpn
IIRC port forwarding is more of a problem with seeding than leeching.
The best way to find groups is actually https://lemmyverse.net/communities . All individual servers are missing other communities due to de-feds or lack of federation. While I can't say numerically how comprehensive Lemmyverse is, it's a lot better than any instance I've tried.
"We’ve spent two years requiring our apps from the ground up to boost our development speed, which should enable us to bring new features to you more efficiently, across more platforms,"
... "and that's why we're deleting a bunch of features never to bring them back. Because we're just so efficient!" Crazy how many companies use this awful excuse.
Also is that a misquote by the author or did they really write "requiring"?
Not the hero we needed, but the one I wanted.
You make a good point lol. I've made the classic blunder of not reading the sub name..
And for those wanting a simpler and more traditional application, Nicotine+ is a great introduction.
"Would have" or "would've", never "would of". Unless you have a would of gotten, in which case carry on.
I'm going to disagree on this one, I've seem far too many comments, especially from LW users, along the lines of "I can't be bothered to change websites because I'm already settled in." Most people are attached to their posts and content and consider moving instance as "losing progress". And the bigger an instance is the harder it'll be to leave if they ever pull something seriously "power trippy" that could lock off content to some people, because there will be a large mass of communities and posts on that instance.
I have a large backlog of five(?)+ plus year old games that are really good and I have yet to play. I'd much rather burn through those enjoying them on high settings instead of playing current games on low settings while trying to dodge crap monetization.