They say they already use it to manage GitHub issues so it's definitely more than "point 0" right now.
JackbyDev
joined 1 year ago
That's always struck me as odd, but I'm also very much an outsider looking in. A "gecko electron" does sound intriguing though.
I see ads pretty much everyday in Windows. They're not as attention grabbing as traditional ads and I think this is part of why some people don't see them.
Just because it might be legal to violate copyrights in other countries doesn't make the code considered open source though lol.
Like I give a shit, I knew what the fuck they meant.
oubilete of agony
Amazing word smithing. 💖
YFW the part about "to see how men and women react differently to pain" was a ruse. They are actually studying how men rate their pain differently when told they're being compared to women versus when they're not.
You're being obtuse. I get the point you're trying to make -- you've been heard. I'm just saying those aren't the terms you should be using to make it. Open source has a very distinct definition and it has to do with the licenses covering the code. It has nothing to do with whether different countries have differing laws. Code cannot be open source in one country and not open source in another because the definition has nothing to do with countries. In fact, that would specifically not be open source because it gives rights to some and not others.
If someone infringes on a copyright that doesn't mean the work isn't copyrighted. You can't just say things that are source available are open source. Even if someone is infringing on the rights holders they're still only source available.
Open source doesn't mean source available. You simply aren't using the term correctly.
Sorry, should've explained I was just responding to the first sentence in particular.