JakobFel

Oh yeah, don't get me wrong, I know it can be worse. I just think it could also be better.

I love Steam but I've always felt like the refund policy was a bit of a joke. I feel like the time limit should be flexible, being a bit longer for games that have long tutorials or a bunch of intro cutscenes.

That's because they're classy and understand that the two are totally different projects. Skyblivion is impressive but that doesn't even remotely mean that an official remaster/remake isn't worth having.

EverQuest Next. That game would have been the best MMO ever, if they would've stuck with it. Unfortunately, SOE got bought out and the new owners were whackos who didn't care. It's sad because nothing has come close since then. Only GW2 and ESO have even a fraction of the concepts of EQN.

Try Stellaris. It's similar gameplay, but it's realtime and the space battles you can get yourself into can be truly epic.

You really do, you just don't want to admit it. It's okay, you don't have to be angry at God. Just let go.

With the exception of chat, try Old School RuneScape. Good game for passive gameplay as well as more intensive/focused gameplay.

I'd say a reasonable amount of this is due to how many of them shove their own ideologies into their reporting, with not even a slight attempt to remain objective or neutral.

Not in every game. Some games make it reasonably fair, such as Elder Scrolls Online which makes it possible to obtain the lootbox items in other ways.

And this is exactly why Ubisoft is dying. Good riddance.

No, if anything, we need to boycott games with battle passes. I'm not a fan of lootboxes but I'd take them any day over a battle pass. Don't pressure me to play specific ways, don't exploit FOMO to try to get me to grind or spend money. I find that a LOT more predatory than lootboxes, at least in games where they're optional.

Ah, didn't know that it's on Steam. Well, there's that at least. Still not a fan of console exclusivity either way, though.