LemmyHead

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 months ago

There's tops you can buy really cheap that you can put in a bottle and have a very cheap bidet. I think for many people it's a struggle to change their mind that this is also OK and it doesn't have to cost thousands of $$$

[โ€“] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 months ago

I can't explain, perhaps due to my limited knowledge about the subject. I understood that compression was a weakening factor for encryption years ago when I heard about it. Always good to do your own research in the end ๐Ÿ™ƒ

[โ€“] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 months ago

I also don't like the duplication of logs in journald and syslog, so I always disable forwarding to syslog

[โ€“] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml -5 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Encryption and compression don't play well together though. You should consider that when storing sensitive files. That's why it's recommended to leave compression off in https because it weakens the encryption strength

[โ€“] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Sounds ridiculous to me. If politicians didn't decide on the rail system because of elon, it's still a problem caused by the politicians

[โ€“] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 months ago

Just buy one ticket to a Taylor Swift concert and you're already a billion dollar richer

[โ€“] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Already India and chine have had working ones for many years. It's not speculative and I recommend you to research the tech. It's unfortunately not very present in western nuclear energy debates. Could be a political reason but that's just a dirty guess

[โ€“] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml -3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

The problem with these arguments and the focus of debates is that they are based on nuclear energy from uranium, not thorium. Thorium is ubiquitous in nature, power centers are much easier to set up and can be small and the waste, while initially (a bit) more radioactive than uranium waste, loses it's radiation level much faster

Edit:typo

[โ€“] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 months ago

Wealth predator. It has more of that negative connotation it deserves

[โ€“] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 months ago

Good is relative tbf. I've had issues installing something natively while installing flatpak just worked

[โ€“] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

As KVM is part if the Linux kernel, I assume you'll have to look into kernel hardening instead, next to OS hardening. Hardware is also important to consider when talking about VM escaping. A CPU that supports better VM isolation features and encrypted memory

[โ€“] LemmyHead@lemmy.ml 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I was arguing how it is a very useful tool with many great additions, rather than rely on the: "no old better!" reply based on ignorance. But it looks like your replies have turned full removed, so no point in continuing here to try and educate you.

 

Electron is a widely hated framework on Linux, but what about the alternatives like Neutralinojs?

In their own words: In Electron and NWjs, you have to install Node.js and hundreds of dependency libraries. Embedded Chromium and Node.js make simple apps bloaty โ€” in most scenarios, framework weights more than your app source. Neutralinojs offers a lightweight and portable SDK which is an alternative for Electron and NW.js. Neutralinojs doesn't bundle Chromium and uses the existing web browser library in the operating system (Eg: gtk-webkit2 on Linux). Neutralinojs implements a secure WebSocket connection for native operations and embeds a static web server to serve the web content. Also, it offers a built-in JavaScript client library for developers.

Do you experience alternatives like Njs to blend more in the desktop layout, install less junk, use less memory, are more compatible with Wayland,...?

view more: next โ€บ