LordSinguloth

joined 5 months ago
[–] LordSinguloth@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago

Yes. Clearly I'm totally illiterate.

Moron

[–] LordSinguloth@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Man I'm not reading that whole chat gpt wall of text

[–] LordSinguloth@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (4 children)

If a single point of obvious facetiousness or a single point that you dislike discredited my entire comment for you, then you're just a bot.

Come on. Flex that brain. You can do it.

[–] LordSinguloth@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

Then I am sorry

[–] LordSinguloth@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[–] LordSinguloth@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

Not that strange.

[–] LordSinguloth@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That's a single single war, and not indicative, power supply remains and always has been a high priority target.

Just cause putin and Kiev avoid chernobyl isn't really evidence to the contrary

[–] LordSinguloth@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago (8 children)

This is a shocker for many on social media but you can accept that something you want is not perfect but still want it, or see good in a bad person, but still not want them on the throne.

Just because I can be realistic about it's pros and cons instead of blindly parroting that I have been told to parrot doesn't mean I can't be pro nuclear.

Other power sources have more problems. And I say just launch the waste into space and eventually the reactors will just be out of the stratosphere and it won't matter if it explodes.

But you got to walk before you can run.

I just dislike when people pretend there are no downside to nuke, EV, wind, etc, because if they make one little comment on a con suddenly they're some anti enviro Trump sucker and get dogpiled

[–] LordSinguloth@lemmy.ca 51 points 4 months ago (19 children)

I'm pro nuke energy but to pretend there are no downsides is what got us into the climate mess we are in in the first place.

Cost, being a major drawback, space being another. And of course while they almost never fail, they do occasionally, and will again. And those failures are utterly catastrophic, and it'd hard to convince a community to welcome a nuclear plant, and if the community doesn't want it then it can't or shouldn't be forced onto them.

They also represent tactical strike sites in time of combat engagement. Big red X for a missile.

There are also significant environmental concerns, as we really have no good way to dispose of nuclear waste in a safe or efficient manner at this time.

It's likely that nuclear based energy is the future, but you need to discuss the bad with the good here or we are just going to end up at square one again. There are long term ramifications.

[–] LordSinguloth@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 months ago

Ah, but one contains millions and the other only hundreds of thousands.

Pull the lever?

[–] LordSinguloth@lemmy.ca 14 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Because the most environmentally friendly car, is the one you already own.

Producing ev is heavy strain on the climate. This change won't happen overnight.

Ev needs to be better and cheaper if it wants to defeat the ice market.

view more: next ›