this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
49 points (77.5% liked)

Memes

46891 readers
2067 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Waluigis_Talking_Buttplug@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (27 children)

Why is this shit always communist vs capitalist, like we've only got 2 answers avaliable. You fuckers never set foot in a communist country and worship this shit

Fucking communist countries have killed how many millions of their own citizens? Don't really think showing a picture of some buildings is enough to prove that they actually solved any issues. They may have solved those issues for some who were lucky enough to get an apartment, but don't be a hexbear and pretend they housed everyone.

And no, I don't want a response with a link about hurr duer capitalism bad, yeah I know, but I live in capitalism so I already know that.

[–] TheOneAndOnly@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (13 children)

It's simple... If you convince the communists that the capitalists are trying to destroy them, (and vice versa), they fight each other, distracting them from the real enemy: the 1% with enough money to directly influence the folk that make the rules that keep them in the 1% club. We're fighting culture wars so we won't fight class wars, my friend.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m still confused and alarmed that the only alternative brought up is communism, not socialism. So far as I know, the core difference is transfer of power - one is peaceful, one is violent.

So in communism, your home might be six feet underground because “It is necessary to achieve the revolution, comrade.” Absolutely zero chance of a leader that wants the best for their people, apparently.

[–] Cowbee@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

That's incorrect.

Socialism is Worker Ownership of the Means of Production. There sre many, many forms, such as Anarcho-Syndicalism, Marxism-Leninism, Democratic Socialism, Market Socialism, Libertarian Socialism, Anarcho-Communism, Council Communism, Left Communism, and more.

Communism is a more specific form of Socialism, by which you have achieved a Stateless, Classless, moneyless society. Many Communist ideologies are transitional towards Communism, such as the USSR's Marxism-Leninism or China's Dengism and Maoism.

Whether by reform or Revolution, the form doesn't change.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is capitalist solution to homelessness

[–] seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

I love the top one, because it's the same way they deal with pigeons. They see poor people as just another pest.

[–] Fogle@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Personally I've never seen the spikes or anything that horrific in Canada. But fuck do those stupid bench "armrests" ever piss me off

These discussions on communism vs capitalism that devolve into comparing the US with the USSR are like discussing feudalism vs liberalism in 1825, when the only perceptible legacies of the French Revolution were the Reign of Terror and Napoleon's degeneration into monarchy.

If you're sensibly anticapitalist, for the love of Marx do not argue in favor of states that rejected all pretension of wanting to let the economy be democratically managed, ultimately turning into party-controlled hierarchies rather than socialism. If you're a liberal in 1825 and rather than arguing in favor of ending serfdom and enfranchising everyone you keep going on about how Robespierre wasn't really that bad, you're politically useless.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is fundamentally false.

While it is true that there was inexpensive housing available in the USSR, and that rents were quite reasonable compared to anything that currently exists in the US, and people couldn't readily be evicted if they lacked the ability to pay, it's a flat-out lie to say that that was the "solution" to homelessness, or that it eliminated the problem. Rather, the USSR criminalized being homeless and not being engaged in socially-productive labor; people that were homeless ended up in prisons and were labelled as parasites. The problem that we have now is that the official records simply didn't record the problem, in much the same way that Stalin had histories and photos revised to eliminate people that had become enemies of the state.

[–] TheScaryDoor@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Rather, the USSR criminalized being homeless and not being engaged in socially-productive labor; people that were homeless ended up in prisons and were labelled as parasites.

Swap USSR with USA and the statement remains true. Though Im sure the degree of severity was much greater in the USSR.

[–] rchive@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's kind of true in some parts of the US, indirectly. Some places criminalize not being homeless but all the things that are the result of being homeless like sleeping outside or in public places. But there are a lot of places in the US that do provide for the homeless. New York City has a right to housing provision, for example.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (18 children)

Why a lot of people on Lemmy like communist so much? As a person who grow up in a country which is almost destroyed by the communist party in the past I don't know what to say just why?, capitalist or not it's depends on your own country's government, at least you still can talking shit about them without getting arrested and torture to death, have we not learn from the past or other communist country, why don't you live in North Korea or China and see how've you like it

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Hovenko@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those were not built for homeless people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leanleft@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Governance has deeper roblems that trace to the top. We are at the bottom.. hell.

[–] TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

What if, and hear me out on this one, the problem isn't which "-ism" is prevalent. The real problem is that ANY form of power or society needs checks and balances. If those are missing or not enforced, then everything goes to shit. It's a balancing act, not just a matter of black or white.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] uis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is not communist solution, this is half-socialism humant colony solution.

Real communist solutions look like this:

[–] finnie@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ugh, living in a forest like that sounds idyllic

load more comments
view more: next ›