MostlyGibberish

joined 1 year ago
[–] MostlyGibberish@lemm.ee 25 points 8 months ago

Right. Why do I have to submit a retinal scan and 3 forms of ID to watch porn because parents can't be bothered to learn basic computer skills and monitor their own children?

[–] MostlyGibberish@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago

Not as long as there are minorities to blame for everything.

[–] MostlyGibberish@lemm.ee 8 points 9 months ago

The only thing stopping them is the fact that anyone who wants the data can just utilize the federation protocol to take any data they want, and there's not a lot anyone can do about it. You can't sell something that's trivial to get for free.

If the question you're really asking is "what's stopping content on Lemmy/Mastodon/etc from being used to train an LLM?" the answer is, nothing.

[–] MostlyGibberish@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Definitely a consideration. In my case, the vast majority of my services are running in docker on a single host box, including the reverse proxy itself (Traefik). That unencrypted traffic never goes out over a wire, so for now I'm not concerned.

[–] MostlyGibberish@lemm.ee 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

I'm not super paranoid about security, but I do try to have a few good practices to make sure that it takes more than a bot scanning for /admin.php to find a way in.

  • Anything with SSH access uses key-based auth with password auth disabled. First thing I do when spinning up a new machine
  • Almost nothing is exposed directly to the Internet. I have wireguard set up on all my devices for remote access and also for extra security on public networks
  • Anyone who comes to visit gets put on the "guest" network, which is a separate subnet that can't see or talk to anything on the main network
  • For any service that supports creating multiple logins, I make sure I have a separate admin user with elevated permissions, and then create a non-privileged user that I sign in on other devices with
  • Every web-based service is only accessible with a FQDN which auto-redirects to HTTPS and has an actual certificate signed by a trusted CA. This is probably the most "paranoid" thing I do, because of the aforementioned not being accessible on the Internet, but it makes me happy to see the little lock symbol on my browser without having to fiddle around with trusting a self-signed cert.
[–] MostlyGibberish@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago

Yeah, the notion that no one uses torrents anymore is hilarious. I use both frequently. Usenet is great and has a lot of benefits, but it doesn't hold a candle to torrents as far as breadth of available content.

[–] MostlyGibberish@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean, that goes both ways. As an American, and especially as a guy, I often get sideways looks when I mention I have a bidet. If you can't or won't try it out, fine, but people are really acting like it's strange to clean yourself off using water.

[–] MostlyGibberish@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago (5 children)

One of the things I like about containers is how central the IaC methodology is. There are certainly tools to codify VMs, but with Docker, right out of the gate, you'll be defining your containers through a Dockerfile, or docker-compose.yml, or whatever other orchestration platform. With a VM, I'm always tempted to just make on the fly config changes directly on the box, since it's so heavy to rebuild them, but with containers, I'm more driven to properly update the container definition and then rebuild the container. Because of that, you have an inherent backup that you can easily push to a remote git server or something similar. Maybe that's not as much of a benefit if you have a good system already, but containers make it easier imo.

view more: ‹ prev next ›