NekoKoneko

joined 1 week ago
[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Bob Odenkirk has never steered us wrong, thanks. I downloaded three copies of this from YouTube in case I forget.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That's incredibly helpful and informative, a great read. Thanks so much!

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

That's a great point.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (4 children)

The Backblaze option is something I've seriously considered.

Any reason this person didn't go with the $99/year personal backup plan? It says "unlimited" and it is for my household only, but maybe I'm missing something about how difficult it is to setup on Unraid or other NAS software. B2's $6/TB/mo rate would put me at $150/mo which is not great.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

For me, I have a bad memory. I might remember a childhood movie (a nickname I give to special Linux ISOs) that I hadn't even thought of for 10 years and track down a copy, sometimes excavating obscure sources, and that may be hours of one-time inspiration and work repeated many times over. Having a complete list is a good helper, but a full backup of course is best.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, this is certainly a viable "brute-force"-ish ooption. While I have 56, I'm only using 26 or so. But I'd actually be hesitant to do anything less than a full capacity mirror because I do expect to eventually use this (and more - adding drives to Unraid).

I've balked because of cost and upkeep (maintaining the same capacity, additional chances for drive failure, two separate sites I need physical access to with a high bandwidth connection), so I admit I was hoping I was missing an easier option.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 11 points 14 hours ago (17 children)

Do you have logs or software that keeps track of what you need to redownload? A big stress for me with that method is remembering or keeping track of what is lost when I and software can't even see the filesystem anymore.

 

I have a 56 TB local Unraid NAS that is parity protected against single drive failure, and while I think a single drive failing and being parity recovered covers data loss 95% of the time, I'm always concerned about two drives failing or a site-/system-wide disaster that takes out the whole NAS.

For other larger local hosters who are smarter and more prepared, what do you do? Do you sync it off site? How do you deal with cost and bandwidth needs if so? What other backup strategies do you use?

(Sorry if this standard scenario has been discussed - searching didn't turn up anything.)

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Fascinating. Definitely still prefer the Go for retro futurism, though.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Beautiful! Love those billboards. Also reminds me to check out a PSP Go, I bet the slide-out design is cool in person.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 39 points 6 days ago (5 children)

PSP is peak retro tech. The disk drive mechanism is so satisfying to open and close, popping out the UMD cartridge...

But yes, Japan preserves their old tech, books and games by default. Used items are almost always immaculately kept and sent cleaned up. It's pretty reliable to buy used in Japan.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm sorry. Recently laid off myself and management avoided directly saying AI was the reason, but other statements (C-suite talking about whether AI can do other work months before the layoffs, in front of me) convince me that was the reasoning.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

The alternative prediction is that this is in fact sustainable and AI companies will in fact have revenue to keep the bubble inflated for a lot longer, just in the worst way - by extracting the value of human-created reliability and trust from the market:

CEOs have also bought into AI almost to a person, and are using it to replace workers, results be damned. AI can't do the things they believe it can, but to them, if they can fake satisfying a need with AI for $5, that is preferable to actually satisfying a need with a real employee for $10.

The CEO is happy because his company saved $5 and he's met his stock option incentive target, the AI companies are happy to pocket that $5 instead of the employee getting $10. Maybe they even raise the customer's price to $12 as AI rent-seeking starts rising, and both companies get $6 each. Win-win, life will go on, just worse for everyone else.

view more: next ›